in addition (to "possible" ... bad intentions) a more general topic: risks carried by many/society vs benefits reaped by few .. this oughtta be in a sensible balance in general !

this should explain it to everybody quite plainly : https://centipedenation.com/first-column/5g-consequences-veteran-journalist-fired-after-criticizing-5g-and-questioning-its-safety/

5g chemtrails IoT Assange evil smart dust

scrubbed from minds account at gab @ TinaTessler a year ago

https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/773379973217001472

How to save the World

The following points are a common denominator for enough people i believe, that it could work. Comments Repost Quote Tina Tessler @TinaTessler a year ago

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic ruthless conspiracy It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.https://hooktube.com/watch?v=rHAR9vprync

fiber optics can support all required aspects without the attack on our health and mental powers

2012 – Nippon Telegraph and Telephone transferred 1 Pbit/s over a single 50 km fiber: 50 (Pbit/s)·km[34]

they are weaponizing wireless against latents and adepts

For those people voting for and implementing 5G, there should be a requirement of being subjected to a minimum of exposure quota to it. If they don't commit to subjecting themselves to it, they should be ineligible to cause others to be subjected to it.