Wolfgang Halbig really dropped the ball with Parkland. He did some good work with Sandy Hook and I actually do recommend anyone who hasn’t seen the recent documentary “Dear Wolfgang” to watch it as it’s a great summary of the Sandy Hook hoax. I love one scene in it where Halbig has a group of parents and citizens gathered in some public meeting place and flat out asks all of them “Do any of you at this point still think any children were shot and killed and Sandy Hook?” And almost all of them emphatically answer no or shake their heads.

But with Parkland, I don’t know if he’s been threatened or what, probably his family has been threatened, but the first interview I heard with him about Parkland he was acting like it was a real shooting. I’ll never understand that. If it looks and smells highly similar to something you know to be a hoax, and is being presented in the same way, with the same lack of evidence to support a real shooting, why would anyone choose to give the media the benefit of the doubt?

Fool me once...:

At this point we all should have a “show me the bodies” attitude towards shootings and terror attacks with how many of them have been complete fakes.

The NZ mosque thing was fake too.

Until we realize these things are FAKE, we are still getting pulled into the predictable dialectic and polarizing just as we are intended to with the staging of these hoaxes.

https://files.catbox.moe/4fm6jg.png :

2019-03-28 | 'There's more to this story': NRA staffer contacted conspiracy theorist about Parkland shooting | US news | The Guardian

---

This has been an automated message.