allahead

Did you see my post on the footage and analysis of the orb shaped drone that hit the second tower? . It could fit in.

Conspirologist

Thanks. I will.

blackguard19

I’m planning on doing a long post about No Planes Theory soon, but it is still my contention that the only passenger airliners on 9/11 were on television and that no one present at the WTC at the time could have seen any aircraft, as there were none.

They play the numbers game. If there are 100 or so people who happened to have a view of the South Tower during the explosion, and they claimed to see no plane (there are people who claim this by the way), it doesn’t matter because 200 million other people saw it on television.

It’s physically impossible for a passenger jet to do what we saw them do on television. It literally cannot have been passenger jets, so once you accept that No Planes Theory really isn’t far-fetched. It’s when you start speculating about drones and holograms that you go out on a real limb.

nomadriders

It’s when you start speculating about drones and holograms that you go out on a real limb.

Israeli companies linked to the WTC had the capability to remote control the airplanes, I recommend reading "Solving 9-11" if you haven't already.

TheRemixIgnition

What airplanes?

Conspirologist

Planes involvement does not make a big difference, since the skyskrapers are build in order to absorb airplane crashes.

blackguard19

Right, so if a Boeing actually had flown into one of the towers, the result would have been much different from what we see on television. This is how we know it cannot have been passenger planes.