madscientist3469

I don't think this is the case. A nuclear blast from underneath would have thrown material outwards, which didn't happen.

Most likely, it was controlled demolition with previously placed thermite on structural pillars. The collapses of all three buildings in NY is consistent with this type of controlled demolition. Additionally, thermite was found in the rubble.

Now this leaves the question of where the hell the massive amount of dust came from, as well as where the mass of the buildings went. Somewhere around like 20% (going from memory) of the rubble you'd expect from buildings this size were actually present at ground zero. There's an interesting theory that nano-thermite was used, which could have been mixed into building materials, or even painted onto walls or columns. It seems feasible that nano-thermote could have generated a massive amount of fine particulate, which caused the cloud and loss of material.

There's another theory advanced energy weapons were used, but I prefer the simplest explanation, which would be thermite, potentially nano-thermite controlled demolition.

badruns

The controlled demolition from mossad is a given with the photographic evidence of their "b-thing" artists next to boxes and boxes and boxes of detonators.

I always thought the advanced energy weapon stuff was a tad loony, but it's hard to explain the damage done to the cars nearby otherwise. http://chazzsongs911.blogspot.com/2007/03/what-melted-cop-cars-7-blocks-from-wtc.html

madscientist3469

Very fascinating links. Yeah, even nanothermite does not explain that very bizarre car damage from blocks away. In parking lots that the debris didn't even travel to.

Haven't yet watched the video ad 1 it's so long, but it's on my list to listen to during my commute. Will check it out soon.

Thanks for the links. It definitely does seem that some kind of advanced technology was used that the public isn't aware of.

Corpse_washer

You could argue that a nuclear shaped charge vaporizes stuff without sending big shockwaves through the ground. You could argue thermite being deployed, but there the video evidence shows no light and you would be stuck after the collapse with the same amount of material, just in a molten form but that was not the case.Also the dustification of this cant be explained with either nuke or thermite, but the top falling cant be explained with directed energy weapons. However, if you consider multiple sides playing different angles...

madscientist3469

What is that picture depicting? I hadn't seen that before. Are those towers on top of building 7?

Corpse_washer

No. Thats one of the twin towers spire(coloumn?) that was left standing after the collapse, and then simply turned to dust.If i remember correctly this was above where the survivors were in the lobby(?).

madscientist3469

Wow. Fascinating. I hadn't heard of this before. Going to dig further. Seems like evidence of some sort of advanced energy weapon if true.

Also hadn't heard of the stolen missile bit. I was aware of the theory that it was a missile, just didn't know it was confirmed to have come from a Russian sub. Going to research that further as well.

Corpse_washer

Confirmed?No. However, i stopped believing in coincidences a long-long time ago.

madscientist3469

Same. There's a great quote from Sherlock about coincidences: "What do we say about coincidence? The universe is rarely so lazy."

Qfan2020

Ugh — so glad I visited...

trevmon

all of NYC is. heightened cancer rates since 9/11

CultureOfCritique

Using thermite on core parts of the steel structure of the buildings is far more likely than a nuke.

Corpse_washer

How do you do this with thermite? You cant even do it with a nuke.

CultureOfCritique

The clouds of dust were caused by the collapsing of the hundreds of floors of concrete-- all that concrete was smashed so quickly and violently it basically vaporized. That's not evidence of a nuke at all.

Corpse_washer

Now read again what i wrote.Maybe look at the picture in question too.

JastheMace

Exactly, what turns high grade steel to dust in seconds? Directed energy weapon.

nonsense_guy

No but Thermite is rather effective at doing that. Also it didn't take Seconds.

Also Cherenkov Radiation doesn't SWITCH OFF AT SET HOURS. This whole thread is absurd

Corpse_washer

Maybe. Im not convinced about that either.

JastheMace

Well whatever it was, it wasn't jet fuel. Also, we do know some explosives were used because we have the footage of the IDF soldiers in the 91st floor pretending to be art students called "gelatin" removing the window, with the entire wall stacked with boxes marked BB-18, fuse holders for demolition blasting caps.

Rellik88

Thermite is incredibly hot and has no problem melting steel, and cement.

Corpse_washer

You admit it can melt steel and cement. It doesnt turns it to dust without visible light. Try again.

Corpse_washer

I dont believe the nuke version. A nuclear shaped charge seems plausible, however the video evidence doesnt support it.

trevmon

it's possible this is a conspiracy that is separate from 9/11, they are just radiating this huge city for population control, and to sicken people to make them more docile, give them cancer so medical industry benefits.

Corpse_washer

The cancer can be attributed to the pulverized and breathed in asbestos. The Hutchison-style dustification presented by Judy whatever, thats the only explanation for the single spire turning to dust. Nuclear shaped charge would have not turn it into dust after, but immediately. Thermite doesnt do that at all. What i think is possible that there were 3 angles to the towers, one hitting it with a missile, one wanting to bring them down and one trying to minimize damage to surrounding enviroment, all 3 by 3 different sides.

trevmon

the cancer could be asbestos plus this radiation, could be 2 or more causes, who knows. I just think if we try to find just one explanation we limit ourselves

Corpse_washer

There is no single explanation, thats the reason i think there were 3 sides with different agendas. One doing the attack, one making it worse and one trying to save what could be saved. If the two towers fell, they would have flattened half of Manhattan(exaggeration, but you get what i mean).

trevmon

yep. it's like with jfk, a lot of people were involved, a lot of shooters shooting, they covered it up haphazardly, so it is confusing as to what exactly happened

Corpse_washer

Oh, its pretty clear what happened. JFK wanted to destroy the private intelligence agency of the bankers - the central intelligence glownigger agency - and without it they would have lost much power.

trevmon

yeah but even tho that sentence seems simple it represents a lot of moving parts, so many were in on it, entire world's govts and media worked together to cover it up

Corpse_washer

Because it is that simple. Its only complicated if you believe entire world's governments and media is not part of the same body. What i do not know, is it a single body with many brains, or a single brain with many bodyparts.

trevmon

it's the motive but not exactly what happened, do you know all of the shooters names, do you know why jd tippet was killed, why was the zapruder film editted etc

Corpse_washer

I know i have it somewhere, yes. I just dont remember all the names but if you insist, i will look it up tomorrow for you.

trevmon

no you don't, m mean I am sure you have seen theories online, for example rich man's trick is pretty good, as is family of secrets, but doesn't back it up with proof, no one can get real proof, we need a legit investigation

Corpse_washer

Oh, then i dont if you say so. I am sure the glowniggers will admit to it eventually because they are retarded enough to keep notes, eh?

trevmon

not freely and it's too late to hang most of the people who did it like poppy bush

Corpse_washer

They are all dead. Thats why you can have the names. There is nothing you can do besides write their names on toilet paper and wipe your ass with it.

trevmon

yep

Themooninthesky

All it takes is a Geiger counter.