Social networks were designed to work without supervision ( conspiracy )

submitted by Conspirologist

All the popular social networks were designed to work without supervision. These networks were designed to have self-sufficient moderation only from the users. As the matter of fact, users are still able to ban whoever they like. Instead of bettering the self-moderaration possibilities, the social networks hired as many supervisors as they could, who are banning everybody who is not conforming to the agenda of the social network's owners, who happen to be judeo-satanists. If you are interested, ask me about the original algorithms that were created for allowing free speech on these sites in the beginning.

cyclops1771

I'll bite.

What about the original algorithms that were created for allowing free speech on these sites in the beginning?

Conspirologist

The original algorithm allowed users to block annoying users, which made you invisible to those you blocked. The most logic way is the fastest and easiests way. This algorithm was implememnted in all the social networks. Now instead of this they are using moderators who decide who can post.

cyclops1771

Did they make your posts invisible to the blocked, or simply you weren't shown posts by those users?

Back on the old forums in the mid to late 90's (about.com, Prodigy boards, Delphi, etc.) it was the latter. You had a stalker, you'd block them, and you'd never see a post they made, nor any comments they made to you.

Conspirologist

No, this is the wrong way. It must be vice-versa. The correct way is when you block somebody, they can't see you, but you are free to see anybody you want who is not blocking you. You also can choose additionally to not see posters, if you find them annoying. It's just a matter of logic chain of cause - effect.