Wrong, they think we are all crazy.

IKR?!

what if I told you we could have limitless energy from our sewage and organic food waste

If you're looking for prematurely dead scientists, Steve Quayle has compiled a list. https://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=146

I wasnt allowed to have my thesis graded. SJW gatekeeper advisor refused to read it, and had no problem failing me for writing on a topic that was supposed to be my choice.

normal scientists dont fall out of the sky. dumb people though, they do. and they can get a PHD. a good scientist is thought of as someone whos smarter than you, but these are rare.

the elite are systemically creating scientists out of these NPC dumb asses. you can call them scientists but they will always be just lecturers and students, they are too stupid and they have no ideas on their own.

They don't have to exterminate. Just by not giving grant money is enough.

Top comment

Fuck, i was too slow. Just see the top comment again.

They regularly kill docs who get close to the cancer cure. Rockefellers have been sitting on the cure since at least the 70s. They are big pharma and make billions from cancer treatment.

The system has been set up to silence real scientists, while promoting pseudo-scientists who parrot the liberal political and social narrative. Real scientists don't get grants, they don't get university positions, they don't get their books published, they don't get their papers accepted by periodicals, they don't get invited to seminars and meetings, they don't get promotions, they don't get appointed to councils and boards, they don't get awards, they don't get on media shows to promote themselves, they don't get speaking engagements, they don't get the support of their peers. The liberal, leftist, globalist, Jew system is set up to destroy them as soon as they reveal themselves as true scientists -- i.e., as soon as they speak the truth.

I'm actually in a scientific field myself. You might be right, I really don't know; but I think a more tame interpretation is that the academic process is weeding interesting people out. To get into academia you have to perform highly in undergrad (which is a real grind - it's much more about tedious perfectionism than it is about genuine learning). Then afterwards you have to get into a Phd program which is an even worse grind and often is just a complete failure if you get a bad PI. On top of that the academic culture has become extremely stale. Controversial opinions are generally avoided. And funding is only given to those furthering the mainstream narrative (this is seen at disturbingly when it comes to "climate change" research). Overall, this environment is very inhospitable to anyone but brown-nosing drones. I think a lot of people who would otherwise become scientists aren't doing so because the process and culture of contemporary academia is so unappealing.

Peer review journals are owned by big corporations, working together with technocrats.
The funding and direction of scientific research is fully controlled by commissions, which are also owned by big corporations and technocratic figures.

Technocrats want to govern everyone, and pretend to be smarter than everyone else. So they need to dumb down and censor any criticism. They are well connected with the wealthy elite.

Academia, and scientists by extension, is a highly collective system. If you are in a physics or chemistry department for example, you are a part of that department in a strong way. The department cannot survive without you and your grants, but you also can't survive or get grants without the department. This in and of itself, is fine. It is actually a good thing, departments vote on new members and all sort of have to agree to make big decisions. However, the problem is that the departments are not totally isolated. The university as a whole interacts strongly with the departments the scientists are in and as the university goes, so must the departments. Of course the university is providing a service (education) ideally to undergraduates. Of course as the consumer undergraduates have a fair amount of sway. So if undergraduates suddenly want sex to be a social construct, to them it is. Then to the university it is, then before you realize it, to the Biology department it is. Everyone in the department may disagree and know that sex is based on genetics but they also know if they want to have good relations with the university they have to play ball.

I think it also is bad that if you are a professor in a science department, you've never been outside of the university system likely. It was liberal when you were 18 promoting gay rights and equality for women back in the 90s and then as a grad student in the late 90s early 2000s it was anti Bush, pro environment, then you got a post doc in the mid 2000s and it was entirely anti Bush pro and slowly sliding ever to the left. Then in 2008, when maybe you got your first shot at a PI/Professorship Obama was elected and the universities loved it. Now, it's a decade later, you're becoming a big figure in the department and your field and you have tenure. Even if somehow you know how the university is handling things is wrong, you won't speak out against it and more likely you think everything they are doing is right.

When I graduated high school in 2008 it was a requirement you take algebra, not that you be proficient in it mind you. When I graduated undergrad you needed to take a lab science, you didn't have to know science but you had to show up. Now I fear as I finish my PhD that we are past the point of no return. The self selection process of academia has created a far left leaning set of professors who do not respond well to outside ideas. They believe that what they and the universities are doing is right and that any dissent of their opinions makes you a racist bigot. I see it happening, I see the polarization in my day to day life. Sadly the best we can do is take back our public schools and make sure that the k-12 education system is working for us and not against us anymore.

Malaysian Air (missing flight) had top AIDS scientists on board en route to present their findings.

Why hasn't anyone written this exact book that I want? It must be because of systematic assassination!

This is whole bunch of conjecture with nothing to back it up.

There are plenty of books on history, psychology, and logic.

Try looking up the curriculum of a university for the history, psychology, and philosophy majors, and you'll find books on history, psychology, and logic.

If you don't know what Modus Ponens is, that's your fault. No one is hiding this information from you.

That's why they kicked me out...

If you ever invent anything that can change the world, you can't make money on it or you will die as soon as you file for a patent. The best course of action is to create a mailing list so large your invention goes out to the public and it can never be stopped. Otherwise it gets put in a filing cabinet and you get put Six Feet Under. This is reality and this is how the break away civilization has so many amazing Technologies.

It wasn't complicated. They infiltrated ivy league schools and created their own version of science. Science is only as good as the publications that they rely on.

Your suspicions are not without foundation..

• Feb. 2017, 74 Prominent NASA Scientists Have Been Killed .

Most surviving NASA "Scientists" have been recruited in the Third World .. suppose they are given the option of "going with the flow" and remaining mum re massive evidence of humans on planets Mars & Venus or "getting the chop."

This is the stuff they are covering up ..

A carved bust photographed in Gusev Crater on Mars by NASA's Spirit Rover in 2008, shows a robed figure wearing a crown.

That he could pass for a modern man turns Charles Darwin's Descent of Man on its head, as well it refutes Adam and Eve and the notion men evolved from Ethiopian ape brutes.

• Head & Shattered Masonry Curiosity Sol 969.
• Martian Salamander. Curiosity Sol 1640.
• Circular metal bracket with bolt holes. Opportunity Sol 4689 .
• Forged Steel Spear Point. Opportunity Sol 3756.
• Martian Crab. Opportunity Rover landing site Sol 344 .
• Martian Fox. Opportunity Sol 985 .
• Live Martian 1. Curiosity Sol 127 .
• Live Martian 2 & Stone Face. Curiosity Sol 300 .
• Live Martian 3. Opportunity Sol 1682 Part 1 .. Part 2 .
• Petrified Human Hand & Foot. Curiosity Sol 608 .
• Dead Martian 1. Opportunity Sol 4183.
• Dead Martian 2. Opportunity Sol 4182 .
• Dead Martians 3 & 4. Opportunity Sol 4182 .
• Martian Whale 1. Curiosity Sol 1276 .
• Martian Whale 2 & Crocodile Skull. Curiosity Sol 1281 .

Sources NASA Spirit & Opportunity Rovers , NASA Curiosity Mars Rover.

Curiosity Rover landed in Gale Crater which is three miles deep and one hundred mi across, which means the impact that formed the crater displaced some 7,500 cubic miles of volcanic ash, to reveal an ancient surface that is in large part intact!

The ash blanket that covers much of Mars' surface came from successive eruptions of volcanoes on the Tharsis Shield, which are said to have occurred between "3.7 billion and 500 million yrs ago." Wiki .

The classical civilization that produced the statues and built the stone platforms predated the Tharsis eruptions, which enlarges the evolutionary time frame out of sight, as well it adds the dimension of space travel.

• Skulls on Planet Venus 1.
• Skulls on Planet Venus 2.

Data returned by the Soviet Venera program that went from 1961 to 1984 which has similarly been kept under wraps, proves there were humans on planet Venus. Link.

The Venus skulls did receive limited exposure in off beat publications that concentrated on totally bizarre stories during the 1980's, which most ppl dismissed as fantasy .. not me however since I knew that is how "they" provide grist for the rumor mill.

Take another look at the Martian 1 image returned by the Curiosity Rover on Sol 127.

That the Martian bears a striking resemblance to Ernie one half of the Sesame Street Bert and Ernie brotherhood, is evidence manned missions had gone to Mars by the time their characters appeared, which predated the NASA Rovers by some decades.

Research Someone is Killing the Great Chefs of Europe , by Nan and Ivan Lyons and Randy Quaid style " Star Whacking ."

Word. What's the title of your book? Sounds super useful.

The mechanism of control you're looking for is called grants.

If you can't get a grant, you can't be a scientist since being a scientists requires that you publish results of studies. To afford a study one needs a grant.

Now, if you're a scientist and want to study something like say the predilection of 13% of the population to commit 50% of the crimes then you're going to have a hard time finding a grant for that.

Dunning and Kruger would like a word with you.

Or the Scientists are going Galt.

this theory makes sense.