agodgavemethisland

It's the adjuvants that are the problem. Mention the adjuvants and the vaccine enthusiasts shut the fuck up real fast.

wanderingblade

Well not completely. Sure they're a huge concern you're right the biggest, but I wouldn't call getting cancer viruses a win either, nor aids or infertility

agodgavemethisland

You're not wrong. Yet, you can't show any of that to a vaccine enthusiast by showing them the vaccine ingredient list, therefor, they simply won't believe it, which means it provides no traction in waking their dumb ass up.

KEVDOG77

Clenliness saved us. Don't eat at the company picnic with Abe who doesn't wash his hands.

xolotltlaloc

proChoice

after reviewing the documented side effects, any one should be able to make their own choice - to medicate or not to medicate.

Jimmycog

sanitation saved us. The street shitters are bring the plagues with them.

webrustler

Why do they use logarithmic scales for the Y-axes, though?

madmalloy

Try to learn how to read graphs.

webrustler

I'm trying, thanks for your response. Learned a lot from that response.

Just noticed on the top graph it even says "...Logarithmic scale". Is there something obvious I'm missing? Don't hesitate to enlighten me.

I'm just curious why that was chosen, just because it coincidentally fits the data? A linear scale would show the downward trend much more drastically, no?

madmalloy

You are confused by a year count and call it logarithmic? Nice try at confusion.