The libtards are doing what Hitler did ( conspiracy )

submitted by Conspirologist

Hitler started censoring and eliminating physically those who were opposing the National-Socialism. Now Libtards are censoring anybody who is opposing their bullshit and are killing those willing to expose them. Think about it.

trevmon

being based? I wish. cuck talk should be banned.

SirNiggsalot

Hitler and the NSDAP were socialists, National Socialists, but socialists none the less. The socialists in the Democrat party would have NO problem with locking up any dissenters, and firing up the ovens. AOC would be glad to throw them into concentration camps and work them to death making solar panels or some shit.

SearchVoatBot

This submission was linked from this v/WhatYouMissed submission by @virge .

Posted automatically (#46958) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here . ( @Conspirologist : Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @virge )

sinclair

Except Hitler was a German fanatic and cared about Germany. Stark contrast to the liberal agenda with cares nothing for America.

Glory_Beckons

The Right persecutes the nation's enemies, to benefit its people.

The Left persecutes the nation's people, to benefit its enemies.

The Fools in the middle can't tell the difference, and ruin everything.

A tragic comedy in three acts, to make our ancestors weep.

sinclair

Clowns to the Left of me, Jokers to the Right. Those in the Middle are not fooled.

Tallest_Skil

lol no

virge

The difference is Hitler knew when to stop, and Liberals can only virtue signal until they cannibalize themselves. It's a game where the end-result is only one person left standing. It's community immolating, not community creating.

Hitler gathered people for a common purpose. Liberals consume each-other in a never-ending game of musical chairs to eliminate competition to prove who can virtue signal the hardest in the end.

Eualos

That's what fascists in power always do

Glory_Beckons

How about I call them authoritarian despots?

They wave Communist flags. They chant Communist slogans. They demand Communist policies. They use Communist methods.

They're Communists.

Why would you call them anything else?

Eualos

Broader category I guess. We don't need to call them anything if they're all dead

Tallest_Skil

Communists aren’t fascists.

Eualos

What's a fascist then?

How about I call them authoritarian despots?

Tallest_Skil

What’s a fascist then

It’s a form of authoritarianism that is ethnicity agnostic. National socialists weren’t fascist, for example.

authoritarian despots

That could work. Authoritarianism has a few forms, but you can call both communism and fascism authoritarian. They simply serve diametrically opposite purposes.

Eualos

What would you call nat soc since they aren't fascist?

Tallest_Skil

I’d call them national socialist. They’re nationalists–a word which inherently means ethnically homogenous, so we don’t need “ethnonationalist” to distinguish it–and they apply their ethnic unity toward a single goal–through socialized government policy–for the benefit of the nation.

Eualos

Sounds pretty nice

Tallest_Skil

There’s a reason the jews demanded the Allies destroy all the German military’s fitness manuals. It’s because jews were absolutely fucking terrified at the culture of physique that the NSDAP had instituted, making the Germans the most fit soldiers in the world, able to hold their own against the entire world with less than half the supplies than individual Allied soldiers. There’s a reason that 90% of Arno Breker’s sculptures were destroyed by the Allies–dynamite and sledgehammer–after the war. It’s because that culture of physique extended beyond the military into German society itself. Surrounded by artwork that showed the beauty of the ultimate of the human form, the entire society couldn’t help but want to collectively improve themselves for the sake of others.

Eualos

That sounds like a wonderful place to live

Phantom42

Well it's never coming back.

We're all so fucked, and you people don't even realize, I think... I mean, you people really don't realize...

I should've killed myself all those years ago.

DeadFox

What they are? National Socialist?

Eualos

But how do you characterize that system of government and how they deal with those who dissent?

DeliciousOnions

At this point you're just playing with words.

Define it however you want, but it's not 'fascism' unless you change the definition of that as well, in which case you can't pretend you're doing anything other than twisting words.

Eualos

Nope. I'm genuinely asking because I don't know. I'm not trying to twist words, words lose meaning if you keep changing the meaning.

virge

Authoritarian seems to be commonly misused (or misunderstood?) today.

Eualos

Would you mind defining it then and giving me a more accurate word to use?

virge

Wasn't a critique of your use, just more of an observation in general after observing you use it.

Eualos

Any thoughts on how to use it more accurately to make my meaning more clear?