No, I meant that. I just find it odd the way in which the shills came out in force here ought to be a call for additional research, and then speculation for the usual culprits.

Ok great.

So, let me demonstrate why this monkey climbs poles for a living instead of doing big brain work.

First, let me give a primer on how some concepts related to electromagnetic radiation.

1) Frequency vs wavelength. EM radiation in a vacuum travels at the speed of light (c), which is just shy of 3*10^8 m/s. Because c is constant, we know that the frequency (f) is inversely proportional to the wavelength (λ). Expressing this mathematically we have c = fλ. Thus given either frequency or wavelength we immediately know the other. Additionally, the energy of each photon (E) is proportional to the frequency. E = hf where h is planck's constant.

2) Flux. The flow of photons per unit area. This relates to the intensity, aka power per unit area.

This fucking guy said at a 1 minute 40 seconds in:

5g operates at 30+GHz which is 15 thousand times stronger than what we're pushing out right now

He's referring to the energy per photon, NOT the flux or intensity. But it is still non-ionizing radiation which is fucking KEY and I'll explain why in a moment. But consider this, if that kind of thing freaks this guy's monkey brain out just imagine how many pairs of his pants he'll shit when he finds out that visible light is 430-750 THz which is like golly 15 thousand times stronger than even 5g. OH THE HORROR!!!!@#$!@#$~!

Obviously, someone can shine a flashlight at you and you'll be okay. People can bathe in the glow of fluorescent lights all day every day and they'll be completely fine.

But "Why?" you may ask. Well because the per-photon energy levels only become dangerous when we're talking about "ionizing radiation" which even this simian pole climber admits that cell phone radiation is non-ionizing radiation at 45 seconds into his video.

Why does that matter? Because what "ionizing" means is that the radiation is so energetic on a per-particle level that it can strip the electrons of of molecules and disrupt their chemical bonds. This matters because it can kill cells and cause genetic mutations. EM radiation starts to become ionizing in the "Far Ultraviolet" range, which is 10^15 Hz+ or the PetaHertz or another thousand or so times as energetic on a per-particle basis as visible light. So 15,000,000 times stronger than 5g frequencies. So to be fucking clear. Photons in the GHz range are not ionizing and they are not even fucking close to ionizing. They're as far apart as the incomes of the Rothschilds vs your local Walmart Greeter.

So how else could EM radiation damage you? Well, by Intensity. It could heat you up by transferring energy directly to you and making your molecules vibrate more rapidly. So in theory, you could stick someone in a giant microwave oven and kill them like that. And just for the fucking sake of argument let's set aside the very obvious side effects of you know... it getting hot first before your blood boils and you would be like "ow this hurts I'm gonna go further away" and thus not accidentally burn to death, much like one would with a fucking... bonfire? Let's just set aside all common sense and look at how intensity works.

Well, from a point source, which a 5g tower may as well effectively be, then here's a fun fact about how radiation works: it falls off with the square of the distance.

Confirm this shit for yourself, fam. Imagine drawing a sphere around a central point. Radiation travels in straight lines - because it "radiates" from that point. So if you draw a sphere around it then obviously that sphere, regardless of size, will catch a constant number of photons hitting that surface (ie all of them). So how does the surface area of a sphere change with the radius?

I'm not going to pretend like your barely-better-than-a-nigger's brain is going to be able to answer that question. The formula for the surface area of a sphere is A= 4πr^2. So since the intensity is power per unit area then that's power / (4πr^2) which means it's (some number)/r^2 thus inversely proportional to the square of the distance away. Meaning if you move twice as far away it's a quarter as powerful. If you move 10 times as far away then it's a hundredth.

So if you don't instantly fucking boil when you're right next to it then you will feel fucking nothing at a hundred yards.

You've experienced just this effect from campfires man. At a distance it's fine but if you put your penis into the coals, it's gonna burn you. Don't be a retard. Also, I'd like to call attention to the fucking fact that these towers are made out of physical materials. If they were that fucking hot it'd melt the tower itself and break all the electrical components for sure. Imagine a radio tower that was so hot it could burn you from a distance like you're thinking. How fucking hot would it have to get? Even molten steel probably can't hurt you at the distances involved because you're not getting that fucking close to it. Like holy shit do you people even think about things at all? Do you have any common sense? Pick up a fucking physics book for once in your lazy ass life. FUCK.

Whatever, let's continue on and listen to what else this moron has to say about things he doesn't understand.

OK now he's talking about EM radiation dissipating at different rates as a function of distance and frequency. But I've literally just got done proving that intensity falls off over distance. Frequency doesn't change as a function of distance so this shit is just incomprehensibly retarded. Frequency is constant in this scenario. What the fuck is this guy even talking about. No. Sorry. I know what he's talking about but he's just wrong. This guy is 105 IQ tops.

Now he's saying that your body won't absorb the EM in the MHz range because the wavelength is longer than the GHz range EM radiation. But while he's right that the GHz stuff is shorter wavelength, he's wrong about the rest of it. This shit reminds me of cargo cults.

Now he's mad about transmitters. Again, if it doesn't get hot it's not going to hurt you. People will fucking notice if they start getting hot. Heat is literally the only possible thing that can hurt you here. Fun Fact: wifi routers span this frequency range. When the wifi is on, do you suddenly get a fever? No. That's retarded. Much like this clown. See, I used math and physics to prove shit to you. You can verify it by simply going to your favorite search engine and checking to see whether the facts I stated are true. This guy is convincing you because you think he has authority on the topic. He's trying to make you feel fear, uncertainty, and doubt. He's just saying spooky shit "oh this mm wave is going to just blast you! it's in the corner of the office! ooga booga I'm a white with a niggerbrain!"

What does "blast you" mean? What physical fucking mechanism causes this "blasting"? He doesn't fucking know. He's just using colorful language to elicit the fear reaction that he's having. I listed PHYSICAL FUCKING QUANTITIES. I gave you actual measurable shit. I gave you math. See the fucking difference?

Yeah he literally just claimed that it's going to destroy the bonds that hold your cells together. Those are chemical bonds. So he's claiming GHz photons are ionizing radiation. I'll source that shit if you want. https://web.archive.org/web/20111020131849/http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet56/oet56e4.pdf

Think about this. If GHz range photons are ionizing, EVERYTHING more energetic than them is too. Which means that visible light would have to be ionizing as well. But we know that it isn't because visible light doesn't "blast you" or "break apart the bonds holding your cells together"

I've had enough listening to this asshole. So fucking mad. If you're retarded you shouldn't speak. He should just keep his head down, his mouth shut, and climb up his poles like the retarded monkey that he is.

Alright so now we've covered intensity

This guy is right in that it hurts at a close range, but he's wrong in his guess that it's strong enough to harm at significant distance because the falloff is exponential instead of linear. So even with a drastic power increase, the "danger" distance maybe only doubles or triples.

you want me to prove a negative? very intelligent.

And yet here you are. With placebos and feels over reals.

How about a hammer? You over thinking dummy.