Anarchy99

1, 2 and 7 all turned to dust in mid air. They didn't collapse from internal demolitions, or thermite or "mini nukes". Or there would have been a HUGE pile of wreckage at least 10 stories high, spread out. There wasn't. Lamont didn't even register any seismic activity of the building coming down. Which is creepy. This was done with a FAR different technology than " demolitions" which is absurd.

somethingsgottagive

where is the report?

FcukMerkel

Where were all the Enron files, do you remember Enron? Building 7

IIJOSEPHXII

Is nobody ever going to explain how 2mm of fuselage and wing aluminium can slice through 54 inches of toughened steel like it was made of paper?

Anarchy99

it can't it was fake plane footage its so obvious. Americans are stooopid

gosso920

Eighteen years later, they determined gravity was to blame.

celestial-skylord

Just because they lie doesn't mean anyone believed them.

IIJOSEPHXII

"It takes two to lie - one to lie and one to listen." Homer Simpson.

Clubbooradley

Unfortunately, plenty of people believed them.

A very simple “woke” test:

Was 9/11 an inside job?

Many who believe that it was an inside job still won’t say it out loud.

fluhthreeex

So this is why you all have been screeching "ISRAEL!" "ISRAEL!" "ISRAEL!" and down-voting me every time I've said: "....and the CIA"? @Israel-Did-9-11 shill

https://voat.co/v/news/3404427/20377176?context=10 - https://archive.fo/UfCOY

https://voat.co/v/news/3395840/20300838?context=10 - https://archive.is/CdEyP

WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI

Why dicktease that news is coming? Just share the news

DABBING_AT_AUSCHWITZ

Read Solving 9-11, it definitively shows that Israel committed 9-11.

speedisavirus

No it isn't

xExekut3x

What did WTC Building 7 have in it? What did the two main towers have in them? I remember reading something that documents proving massive corruption within the US government with major businesses was held in them, but it's been so long, now...

EngelbertHumperdinck

One or two of the floors right were one of the planes hit were occupied by Kroll & Associates. But they were fortunate to have cleared out their entire offices just days before the event, leaving only their computer servers full of evidence of their criminal activities. Recently, the son of the owner produced some super jewey netflix cartoon in which he denigrates 9/11 truth.

As for building 7, aka the (((Solomon))) Brothers building, I think it held offices of intelligence agencies. I know Giuliani's emergency base of operations was in there, which his team did not use that day.

Sorry if that's not all accurate. I'm going by memory too.

psioniq

I seem to recall that everything concerning the Enron case, was stored in building 7 too.

Anarchy99

There were no planes

EngelbertHumperdinck

I don't know. I've seen the video of the wing appearing to go behind the building and I agree that the other videos of the impact on tower 2 don't look entirely convincing either. But at this point, I think whether or not they were hit by planes is not super important. Have you ever seen any footage of the initial explosions which do not show planes at all? I think it would be a difficult task to hunt down every single recording, silence the person who shot the it, and edit in the planes. What would be much easier is to edit that one clip to make it appear that the wing traveled behind the building to make 911 truthers argue over this detail and not focus on retaliation against the jews who orchestrated the attack.

Anarchy99

where is the plane ?

https://youtu.be/vDrbhFxKK-Y

EngelbertHumperdinck

Ah, I see. Thanks. I don't remember seeing that one before.

Anarchy99

Then there is this one. Notice they switch between resolutions on the videos. The clearer video shows an explosion with no plane. Most people do not catch it. You can tell everything is fake when you see the clear footage comparatively.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=5Tl__04Xoi0&list=PL94307CC5E95EDF7B

Anarchy99

many hours studying the fake footage

Anarchy99

no plane wreckage, anywhere

EngelbertHumperdinck

I always thought it was clear that no plane hit the pentagon or went down in Shanksville, but just assumed that planes had actually hit the towers just because that would have been more difficult to cover up. Of course it was not planes that brought the towers down, but I figured they just used the planes as a cover for the demolition. I still think we need to focus on retribution first and then figure out the "how" afterwards.

ArcAngel

the only way fire woildve brought down any of these buildings, were if 6 gorrilion jews suddenly spontaniously combust in the buildings..

EngelbertHumperdinck

They do burn extra hot.

#BurningKikesMeltSteelBeams

ArcAngel

i heard, back at aushwitz, the previously creamated jews fueled the next batch.. thats how they were able to cook 6gorrilion kikes in 3 years! oy vey!

doubleanalbypass

oh the media will be all over..

..something else.

undertheshills

The NTSB report proved it wasnt fire. The model they used is not the same as the video of the collapse. The building in the model crumpled in on itself and didn't collapse at free fall. They basically gave a model of how a fire could theoretically collapse a building like WTC7 but that model does not reflect the video evidence of how the building fell. Its complete bullshit just like the Pentagon attack.

LexOrandiLexCredendi

Pentagon attack

Oh come on. Planes accidents happen all the time without debris fields. At precise angles. And just happen to hit the part of the building which is about to be audited after showing a huge loss of money.

You and your wacky "conspiracy theories".

Darksideofthemoon87

Only after those sections have been been recently "reinforced"

meowski

idk why we need to use photoshopped images on this