Based on where the planes hit, complete collapse is physically impossible without explosive help. ( conspiracy )

submitted by ScannerDarkly

For every action there is an EQUAL AND OPPOSITE reaction.

It is physically impossible for the much smaller upper portion of the building to be able to crush the much taller and stronger built bottom portion.

30 upper floors can only crush at most 30 lower floors. Even less if the 30 below have more steel reinforcement.

The only way the upper portion can do more damage is with explosive help.

You know our school system is fucked when no one bothers to question why the upper 30 floors were completely invulnerable to the crushing forces until they hit the ground.

RootCauseFinder19

Terminal velocity can't change newtons 3rd law

underground_lurker

Not he best way to approach this argument. Looks at the tiny volume of jet fuel, in comparison to the mass of the buildings (which certainly couldn’t have been so well insured without impressive sprinkler systems). Look at videos of controlled demolitions. All else fails, WTC7 Defoe’s all explanation.

xolotltlaloc

So... basically "not Muslims" .

/Just to be clear.

ScannerDarkly

The planes we were told hit the buildings, I do not believe were used. They wouldn’t sacrifice the mossad agents on board.

IMO.

Also what crashed in shanksville was meant for building 7.

ADaniels

Quit it with all your FACTS and LOGIC, goy.

meowski

Not to mention that WTC7 wasn't even hit by a plane and it also imploded in a controlled demolition

ScannerDarkly

Or WTC 6 that was turned into a crater before any building came down.

IIJOSEPHXII

You had to say, "the planes hit" didn't you?

ScannerDarkly

If you have evidence that it was not a plane, feel free to share.

Regardless, 30 floors of building cannot crush 80 stronger built floors.

IIJOSEPHXII

The burden of proof is not with me.

ardvarcus

This is the dumbest fucking shit In The World. We all saw the airplanes hit the towers, and we saw them catch fire, and we saw them collapse in on themselves. Who are you going to believe, some conspiracy or your own lying eyes, right? How can people convince themselves that they didn't see what they saw? The simplest explanation is what we all fucking saw happen !

7e62ce85

I think your argument is bad, but all 3 towers did look like controlled demolitions, especially WTC 7 which was never hit with anything. Explosions can be seen (as with controlled demolitions) on the videos many floors below the falling section.

muffalettadiver

It's fucking obvious.

Empire_of_the_mind

Impossible! Who could have had access to the building interior and detonators???

http://magaimg.net/img/8xqm.jpg

meowski

Mossad b-thing Gelatin.

BB-18 bus bars = demolition wiring terminals

Monkeyshinerbot3000

Says another armchair engineer with no credentials.

Monkeyshinerbot3000

Well that doesn't mean shit. Also I noted that not one individual has brought into question the buildings age or the fact that it was built by the lowest bid. Without at least a modicum of critical thinking we may never know the truth.

EngelbertHumperdinck

You dismiss someone's observations by calling him an armchair engineer with no credentials. So I show you 3000 credentialed engineers, but that doesn't mean shit. And you're right, 28 year old buildings often explode into dust when hit by one or zero planes, leaving pools of molten steel for months afterwards.

Monkeyshinerbot3000

I didn't watch zero aircraft smack those buildings. Nope never saw that one.

EngelbertHumperdinck

Building 7 was not hit by a plane, retard. You have got to be the dumbest person I've ever talked to about 9/11.

Monkeyshinerbot3000

Did you even read the headline?

EngelbertHumperdinck

Yes

GumbyTM

Who just made the case that 60 floors of falling material would do less damage than 30 floors of material.

There are things to question about that day which are legit fucked but the sheer volume of retards spew8ng shit like this ensures that will never happen.

dickbutt

Least funny, but most accurate thing I've ever read on this site.

Monkeyshinerbot3000

Everyone seems to want to pretend that these buildings weren't 30 years old, and weren't built by the lowest bidder. Amazing.

ScannerDarkly

You don’t have to be an engineer to grasp basic universal physical laws.

Do you have an actual argument? Last I checked, name calling wasn’t a valid argument.

dickbutt

I'd call this post satirical speculation at best. Newton would slap your nuts if he read this.

It's still better than the official description though.

ScannerDarkly

30 floors can only crush 30 floors. Newton would slap you for thinking anything more was possible.

dickbutt

Tyrone, put down the book and get back in the field you stupid nigger. You can't even read

Simonsaysgoat

Its simple really. I argued with an "engineer" about this and was blown away that he believed the official story

ScannerDarkly

You are right, the explanation is extremely simple.

If I need something built, I wouldn’t hire anyone who believes the official story.

Maroonsaint

Who cares what happened it happened. Nobody did anything about it. I was in dc the day they released the classified documents exposing the cover up of or soldiers dying for no reason. In dc. In the heart. And not a single protestor was out. Nobody nothing. Nobody cares. Nobody gives a shit. We’re the few. We’re outnumbered soon we’ll be extinct. Maybe the Chinese will liberate the world or something cause whites are done. It’s sad and it hurts but it’s true.

ScannerDarkly

You take what happens in dc as being accurate for the rest of the US. That’s just plain ignorance.

Your generalizations are wholly inaccurate. Nobody this nobody that.

You sound like a real fun guy at parties.