TheGreatAustralian

It is most unusual to encounter anyone with something good to say about Richard Nixon, he was and still is the only elected US official to have positive input re the JFK assassination .. in 1970 he brought Justice Dept. lawyer John Dean into the White House to "clean up the mess" of the Watergate burglary, which he knew nothing of.

Dean's disloyalty toward Richard Nixon identified him as the most vile actor in the entire drama, he was to go thru the available evidence, identify the White House ppl responsible and recommend their sacking thence prosecution .. instead of doing that he hopped onto the play dumb bandwagon and left Nixon to stew in his own juices.

Had John Dean fulfilled his obligation to Richard Nixon, the entire JFK assassination conspiracy which Nixon called the " Bay of Pigs ," would inevitably have come tumbling down.

Insofar as lead Watergate burglar E Howard Hunt also took part in the assassination .. see the hatted figure in the Moorman Photograph firing on the President in company with Martin Luther & Coretta King, black Secret Serviceman Abraham Bolden and Andy Warhol.

Update - It seems very likely RN was "under the gun" of his Chief of Staff HR "Bob" Haldeman.

insofar as LuckyPuppy.net says Haldeman and Watergate conspirator G Gordon Liddy murdered Officer JD Tippit in Dallas at around 1:08 pm Nov. 22, 1963 in a crime that was blamed on Lee Harvey Oswald, despite photographs and film show LHO standing in the doorway of the TSBD when the shots were fired at President Kennedy at 12:30pm the same day, and that he was still in the doorway when the Three Tramps were marched by hours later.

ardvarcus

Nixon wasn't any saint, but he didn't do anything the Democratic Party wasn't also doing, in spades. It's just that his misdeeds and political "tricks" got highlighted by the media, and the wrong-doings of the Democrats were ignored or covered up. Watergate was about looking for dirt on the Democrats that could be used against them in the election. Nixon's people weren't going to fabricate anything, they just wanted to find out what crimes the Democrats were committing. But they went about it in a criminal manner, and got caught, and then Nixon was betrayed by a man he trusted (a man who should burn in hell for eternity for his betrayal of trust).

Barfin

agreed. and why would trained CIA operatives bungle the op in such a way, you're telling me they couldn't get in and get out without being caught? Nixon himself might be lying here, but it is a good question don't you think:

Almost no one has better expressed reasons to doubt Nixon’s involvement

than Nixon himself. In his memoirs, Nixon described how he learned about

the burglary while vacationing in Florida, from the morning newspaper. He

recalled his reaction at the time:

It sounded preposterous. Cubans in surgical gloves bugging the

DNC! I dismissed it as some sort of prank . . . The whole thing

made so little sense. Why, I wondered. Why then? Why in such a

blundering way . . . Anyone who knew anything about politics

would know that a national committee headquarters was a useless

place to go for inside information on a presidential campaign. The

whole thing was so senseless and bungled that it almost looked

like some kind of a setup.

https://whowhatwhy.org/2012/05/08/watergate-revelations-the-coup-against-nixon-part-2-of-3/

TrialsAndTribulation

Nixon was a victim of the deep state, even back then, just as JFK was. In fact, it was Nixon's interest in JFK's assassination that put a target on his back. In the White House transcripts, he mentions "the whole Bay of Pigs thing" a few times, which may believe was code for Kennedy's assassination. He was screwed out of the 1960 election by massive vote fraud in Texas and Illinois and was deeply upset with the assassination, thinking it was a coup d'etat, and sought evidence of it.

There's much more, but you'd have to read Roger Stone's book on the subject. Stone knew Nixon better than anyone, and I think he has the final word on both JFK and Watergate.

JohnConnor

It was a physiological event for the American people , to make the public believe that no one is above the law and that even presidents can be brought down . The common sheep will refer to this event when talking about conspiracies as if nothing can be hidden from the public , this event and the Monica and Bill event in the 90's are the same , make the American public believe that any sort of secret can't be hidden

ardvarcus

Watergate was a lie. It wasn't about exposing the truth, it was about liberals and leftists using the media to destroy a conservative president.

JohnConnor

Both parties are controlled , it doesn't matter if its a conservative or a democrat they belong to the same group of people . You should know this by now otherwise what are you doing on VOAT.

Barfin

yess zinn said:

Chapter 20, "The Seventies: Under Control?", covers political corruption and American disillusion with the government during the 1970s. Zinn argues that the resignation of President Richard Nixon and the exposure of crimes committed by the CIA and FBI during the decade were done by the government in order to regain support from the American people without making fundamental changes to the system. According to Zinn, Gerald Ford's presidency continued the same basic policies of the Nixon administration. Other topics covered include protests against the Honeywell Corporation, Angela Davis, Committee to Re-elect the President, the Watergate scandal, International Telephone and Telegraph's involvement in the 1973 Chilean coup d'état, the Mayagüez incident, Project MKUltra, the Church Committee, the Pike Committee, the Trilateral Commission's The Governability of Democracies, and the People's Bi-Centennial.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_People%27s_History_of_the_United_States