TheRemixIgnition

Phil Schneider (in 1996) and Dimitri Khalezov (in 2010) also both point out that mini nukes were responsible for this.

MartinTimothy

My understanding is Phil Schneider met a very sticky end, allegedly because he had spilled the beans re the extent of tunneling going on underground in the Lower 48, could be because he was talking nukes at OKC as well.

sheasie

Reminds me of (((9/11 and Fukishima))).

AnonTruthHurts

They could have stole a couple computers, but no! Let’s nuke the place instead. Come on man.

Fambida

Lets play a game called Which Is More Likely.

Is it more likely that hypothetical super miniaturized nuclear weapons were used to attack the federal building, or that an easily available and dirt cheap chemical explosive was used?

Is it more likely that a conspiracy to plant micronukes was enacted by members of the federal government with no leaks or whistleblowers whatsoever, or that at most, McVeigh was a patsy?

Jimmycog

There was evidence in that building it had to go, the rest is a historical lie

tom9152

How do you explain McVeighs' interviews?