beefartist

You guys can get triggered but how is this any different (I agree fucked up) than foreign embassies on US soil, or vice versa...aren't you faggots tired of faux outrage over old fucking news that the UN is a nation unto itself (perhaps THE nation)

Lurky_McLurkmoar

aren't you faggots tired of faux outrage over old fucking news that the UN is a nation unto itself (perhaps THE nation)

I'll take any outrage against the UN and JWO. Ratchet that shit up to 11

beefartist

It is useless to worry about and a complete distraction from your actual life

Grayspirit

From what I understand from the video, the venue was held in a public building. Paid by taxes from the people of Utah and the US. Yes an Embassy is recognized foreign soil, as agreed between the two countries. Here, they just established a zone that was "Not of the US, and not subject to the laws." So in essence, the UN 'invaded' the US without consent of the people of the US. How would you feel if your neighbor walked into your living room and declared it their property?

beefartist

That's a really stupid analogy. You and I both know neighborly relations and the US gov/UN is very different. Very likely there is a charter that was ratified BY US representatives that allowed this specifically. I can't remember which bush it was but I am pretty sure they technically signed us up for a North American "EU", they just never got to implementation (yet)

Grayspirit

Who are you protecting? No, I Don't know if there was a charter or not. Doesn't take away from the fact that it was occupied territory on US soil. And my analogy is sound. Should not the people of the US have been asked before Bush 1 or 2 just made us part of the EU?

NotHereForPizza

muh Beanz

Don't you guys stop?

pby1000

Why does it need to be UN territory for them to have a conference there?

ArcAngel

entitled niggers..

till some patriot blows a hole in their face. 'on U N property' IN the USA... hard time getting a proper conviction