I don;t think "tech" and "engineering" are as closely related as you say, in order to use the term "proves."

One can be highly functional in math and engineering without having to have the technological advances. Technology, imo, builds on other technologies and knowledges, and flows from one discovery/advancement to another. For example, the incandescent lightbulb didn't just pop into existence. First we had to understand how to produce a steady flow of electricity. To do that, we had to understand capacitors and resistors. To do that we had to understand which materials had the correct amount of resistance and flow. To do that we had to be able to measure the electric flow. To do that... the list could go on for miles.

When it comes to simply mental functions, there is nothing the ancients didn't have that we have, excepting computers for advanced modeling and sheer processing power. They had roughly the same physiology as us, the same brain capacity and ability to use it. They were just missing eons of experimentation and knowledge to advance the technology. They were fantastically adept at measuring angles and putting into practice the mathematical arts. The only technology they needed was the concept of the lever. Once you have that, you have the counterbalance, and voila! , you have the pyramids. (Well, that and a LOT of labor!!)

I think many times we forget that not having technology doesn't mean stupid and ignorant.

I don't recall. I do know that the motar used in China's Great Wall was sweet rice.

YES, The Revelation of the Pyramids, quite an eye opening show.

Well, ya got me there. I'll reverse myself and say this sub is appropriate. I'll agree that it's definitely a conspiracy, especially when one considers how such esteemed establishment institutions as the Smithsonian has destroyed artifacts in order to maintain the Beringia paradigm. Tons of artifacts removed from American mounds across the American midwest were sent to the museum in the 1800s. They were eventually collected and towed to sea in barges and dumped. True story.

You realize this supports what i said, no?

try telling Zahi Hawass that

Greek fire, Univeral Antidote, flexible glass, heat Ray weapons, it's theorized that Egyptians had wireless electricity that used the gold capstones on the pyramids as a conduit. There are glyphs of lightbulbs and flying crafts. Someone kept lots of history and technological advances from the public and only the elitists know of it. We certainly didn't come from rocks. There was even nanotechnology in ancient Greece. If anything we had advanced knowledge back then and then we had the dark ages. Now we are fed lies and kept in the dark about the true history of the world.

For one, we can't build a pyramid with the same precision as they have and also the stones were so perfectly placed together that a piece of paper cannot be placed between them. They were also built directly under certain stars in the sky. Each stone weighs tons of pounds.

aLiEn TeChNoLoGy.

You think slaves built the pyramids? Lmao.

Can he move 100 TONNES???

Because that's how big the Great Pyramid stones are.

I think he used sound waves or a frequency to some how to manipulate matter. I'm sure the Egyptians did the same. I am familiar with the story but I don't think civilians were let into how it was done.

No one knows how he moved them. He claimed it was reverse magnetism or some supernatural ability. A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like hydrogen balloons.

Edward Leedskalnin. He was a Finnish immigrant who built them using very simple principles, such as levers and pivots. There's a fellow named Wally Wallington who built a scale model of Stonehenge using cement blocks he cast and erected them by himself using the same methods.

Evolution is saying that things become bigger and better as time goes on. The creation improves itself. If we came from " monkeys" then why were there Giants? Read about the " Golden Age". Then get back to me.

Mutations never add complexity to DNA, they only break something. This has been proven in the latest science. It is just one fact that disproves macro-evolution. Read Darwin Devolves.

Apparently you are not aware of the mathematical precision of how it was built, why it was built the way it was and why the location it was built in matters. Read about the pyramids before commenting. There's more to the story than the fake slaves built it bullshit.

There is no way we could build the Great Pyramid today. If you think so you are unaware of the facts about the Great Pyramid and how ridiculous the engineering is.

It’s a cool ass pile of rocks you dork

Really? Do you have a source? Something I can read or watch