The cure for cancer isn't to start using certain methods or drugs or plants (though I'm sure specific types can cure). The cure is stopping the exposure to huge populations of whatever was introduced a generation or so ago that has made us so prone to cancer. All the old timers I've talked to about cancer these days talk about how it used to be an old persons disease and cancer developing in what are supposed to be strong young bodies with healthy immune systems is pretty rare.

Seriously, if a (huge effing) list could be made of substances introduced en masse for the past 100 years, and if one had the omnipotent power to stop the supply of substances one at a time to individual population centers and write down which populations experienced less cancer you can by process of elimination determine which substances have direct correlation with cancer increases. I imagine that you would find multiple substances that correlate... Substances that have been approved by the joke called the FDA.

You're not going to find a magical plant in the Amazon that helps your body "heal itself naturally" or some other bullshit.

You realize that almost all drugs are made out of plants right? Aspirin is concentrated from tree bark, Anti-biotics are cultured out of fungus, etc.

Yeah, this makes complete sense. Because no one in the pharmaceutical industry and no oncologists have any relatives or friends who are getting vaccines, and none of them have any friends who might be at risk of dying of cancer.

It's not about genetically engineering a "terminator gene" though. Plenty of cancers will go into remission if the host is healthy enough to fight, so it's not like the body is incapable of beating some wildly reproducing cells that don't know when to die.

I'm not claiming I have all the answers, but I'm not for one second going to write off natural cures.

Unless you have some oncological/biological qualifications I'm unaware of, I'm not sure that anyone on this website is qualified to make such a sweeping statement.

Well the first part about the industry not wanting a cure is good...

Sooo, if nagalase cause cancer, and autistic children have high amount of nagalase in their blood.
Why aren't autistic children suffering from every types of cancer ever?

( According to wikipedia, nagalase is Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase, is produced by the body and is an enzyme used to break down glycolipids . )