wrathfulmomes

"It banned U.S. economic, and military assistance, and export credits to countries that deliver or receive, acquire or transfer nuclear enrichment technology WHEN THEY DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE IAEA REGULATIONS AND INSPECTIONS. "

It's not fucking illegal when they comply with those. Quit making everyone look like a conspiratorial dipshit.

Sleuth222

  1. Nuclear fission is a lie.

  2. This is so far beyond the point, how about pointing out that israel is stolen territory and people shouldn't be paying them to kill Palestinians.

wrathfulmomes

Retard, nukes are real. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were real. "But the power wires werrnt meltuddd" JFC, no jet fuel can't melt steel beams, but the power lines and other shit were completely pulverized for quite some distance around. Yes, farther AWAY gradually more things survived including power lines. There is more than enough evidence to prove it happened like effects you might not expect, so they weren't predicted... but they were seen, and then an explanation was found. Funny how that works. Science doesn't give a shit what you think. It works whether you believe in it or not.

Sleuth222

Retard, nukes are real. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were real.

Retard, they aren't/weren't.

"But the power wires werrnt meltuddd" JFC, no jet fuel can't melt steel beams, but the power lines and other shit were completely pulverized for quite some distance around. Yes, farther AWAY gradually more things survived including power lines.

Strawman, who are you arguing with? When did anyone mention any of that?

There is more than enough evidence to prove it happened like effects you might not expect, so they weren't predicted... but they were seen, and then an explanation was found.

Come forth with the evidence then.

Science doesn't give a shit what you think. It works whether you believe in it or not.

Indeed. Nuclear fission is a lie.

iunno

You're making assertions but no argument. Why should anyone listen to you?

Sleuth222

It's the other way around. Can you or I create nuclear fission? No. So where is the proof it exists?

iunno

Years of nuclear physics. I mean, you or I could create fission, but it wouldn't be a good idea.

Sleuth222

Years of nuclear physics.

It's a farce.

iunno

Yes, moron. I'm sure there's a bunch of scientific literature regarding nuclear fission. What, it's not proof unless the scientists come over and do the experiments at your house?

Sleuth222

scientific literature

The same for global cooling/warming and climate change/crisis. The same for space exploration. The same for dinosaurs and evolution. All lies. No actual evidence for their existence, just like nuclear fission.

the scientists

The vast majority of these "scientists" are government paid agents conducting experiments that they are told to conduct and coming to the conclusions that let them keep their pensions.

Listen to Galen Winsors speech.

iunno

Yes, there's a lot of politics and bullshit in the scientific community, but what the fuck is your metric for proof? Or is that just your go-to any time someone refutes your assertions?

What's Japan's position on this? Or are they in on it too? Nuclear reactors? Or does it have to be an explosion?

I'm watching this Galen Winsor thing and so far the jist of it has been that radiation isn't all that dangerous, not that nuclear weapons or reactors aren't real.

Sleuth222

what the fuck is your metric for proof?

Experiments that are repeatable.

What's Japan's position on this? Or are they in on it too? Nuclear reactors? Or does it have to be an explosion?

Is Japan some magical land that doesn't have a jewish controlled currency?

I'm watching this Galen Winsor thing and so far the jist of it has been that radiation isn't all that dangerous, not that nuclear weapons or reactors aren't real.

Keep watching.

iunno

So are you making an assertion that nuclear experiments aren't repeatable? You can get your hands on radioactive materials and presumably equipment to do many experiments yourself. Unless you've done the experiments yourself and found them to be unreplicable, "nuclear fission is a lie" is a claim on your end. Could be true, but it's a far more extraordinary claim to suggest that the majority of nuclear physics and the major world events involving it's application are all lies.

Japan is the only country to be attacked by nuclear weapons, and there were surely many witnesses to those events. Are they all lying, or are you suggesting that firebombing would appear the same as nuclear explosions, or what?

I still haven't watched the rest of that video, but he's already referenced nuclear weapons and reactors, so it seems pretty unlikely that he's going to turn around and say they don't exist.

Sleuth222

You can get your hands on radioactive materials and presumably equipment to do many experiments yourself.

Presumably, exactly. My entire point.

it's a far more extraordinary claim

It's extraordinary because your idea of ordinary comes from television, a jewish controlled medium.

there were surely many witnesses to those events. Are they all lying,

More presumptions. Even still, by their own lies those places would have been uninhabitable for many many years. It's all bullshit.

iunno

Have you attempted to procure the equipment and materials to do these experiments yourself? Or are you just talking entirely out your ass on this subject? Granted, I don't know much about nuclear physics either, but that is why I am deferring to the work of people who have dedicated their lives to it. You seem to be simply asserting that fission is a lie, based on nothing other than "I haven't seen the proof/experiments for myself". I finished watching that video and while he did go on to talk about fissile material, he said nothing at all about it being a lie or not existing. His point was that nuclear "waste" isn't waste and all the safety mechanisms surrounding it are there to create profit.

Yes, I am presuming that the inhabitants of a relatively small island country would have seen a couple of massive singular explosions, and accounts of such a major event would have witnesses. I am not going to research this for you because it is the established position, so if you want to take a counter position, the impetus is on you to find evidence. Shouldn't be too hard, if your position has any merit. A nuclear explosion in an inhabited area is quite a large scale and public event.

You have nothing backing up your argument. You haven't even presented anything, aside from pointing me to a video which refutes your claims. What's your angle?

Sleuth222

His point was that nuclear "waste" isn't waste and all the safety mechanisms surrounding it are there to create profit.

Not for profit, for reasons of fear control unknown to him. And what say you of that massive lie? Is that true?

You have nothing backing up your argument.

My argument is something doesn't exist. You can't prove something doesn't exist. Your argument is it does exist, which should be easily provable. It is not as easy to prove as you would think, though. You are having a hard time, only presuming and pointing to trust in authority.

it is the established position

Statements like that show you are not actually seeking the truth in anything. The established position of whom? The "scientific community," the jewish media, and the freemasons. Go read the so called witnesses tesitmony of nagasaki and see for yourself how ludicrous it all sounds. It's as laughable as the holocaust.

iunno

"Reasons of fear control unknown to him"? Are you retarded? It's pretty clear that he was saying that someone is profiting off of unsubstantiated fears. He even used the term "featherbedding".

Your argument is that there is a massive conspiracy to make people believe in something nonexistant. You pointed me towards Galen Winsor as an authority confirming this and yet he contradicts your with pretty much everything he said in the video I saw. I guess you're just so fucking stupid you don't realize that "fissile material" implies fission.

Anyway I'm done talking to you. You're hopelessly retarded and apparently incapable of forming any kind of argument.

No6

Do you know where I can find more information on point #1?

Like a website that explains how smoke detectors really work? I bet there's a reason the government mandates those things...

Sleuth222

Look up Galen Winsor, he designed and ran several nuclear facilities, even swam in so called "toxic" waste.

https://big-lies.org/nuke-lies/www.nukelies.com/forum/index.html This board is no longer active but has some useful information.

rspix000

for a well sourced historical approach https://www.israellobby.org/nukes/default.asp

VoatContainmentGuard

They must pay back all aid with interest. Somebody post this on orange kikes twitter.

i_scream_trucks

I dont believe they even have them.

FinkleIsEinhorn

Nukes are hellywood propaganda. They arent real.

Inb4 muh wwii japan, japan was fire bombed. Plenty of stru1qctures left standing in the aftermath photos. The cities were mostly wooden buildings and burnt down.

WeKnow

Unless you provide sources, your argument is dead

FreakingFatFupa

Appeal to authority. Someone got too much edumuhcaytion

Atkho

That would be crazy if North Korea was the only country to have real nukes.

Samsquamch

Israel is the only country in the middle east that has nuclear weapons

Both Iran and Pakistan possess nuclear weapons.

Shotinthedark

And india

hauzer

India and Pakistan aren't in the Middle East...

Sitnikoff

Source?

cyclops1771

And that is why Israel has 100%, always denied owning or having nuclear weapons.

VoatContainmentGuard

They have chemical weapons, also.