Crensch

That moment when you realize your position aligns with /anonall

HarlandKornfeld14

I don't give a shit about fitting into one ideological box or another.

Crensch

It's got nothing to do with that.

If your ideas align with Voat's analog of CNN, you're probably wrong.

HarlandKornfeld14

If you ideas align with the interests of the state of Israel and the military industrial complex, you're probably wrong. My position on opposing Jew wars has been consistent, I'm not going to cheer them on because Orange Emperor said so.

Crensch

Well, it's one or the other; definitely CNN, or possibly 4D chess with Trump.

If I had to choose either definitely agreeing with CNN or only possibly agreeing with Israel and the MIC, I'd take the latter.

I don't believe CNN to be pushing things that are not sanctioned by Israel and MIC.

HarlandKornfeld14

No, its not "one or the other". I'm not going to be pigeonholed into subscribing to one kosher sandwich ideology or the other.

Crensch

I'm not pigeonholing anything. You either agree with /v/anonall , or you do not.

Your post agrees with them. Meaning your post agrees with 100% sure propaganda from (((them))).

HarlandKornfeld14

Pigeonholing is exactly what you are doing. My position opposing Jew wars is consistent. It doesn't matter whether the "liberals" or "conservatives" are for a particular foreign adventure that Jews want, my position remains unchanging.

Crensch

Pigeonholing is exactly what you are doing. My position opposing Jew wars is consistent. It doesn't matter whether the "liberals" or "conservatives" are for a particular foreign adventure that Jews want, my position remains unchanging.

It's not at all what I'm doing.

If your position aligns with a vertiable (((CNN))), then what you are agreeing with is Jew propaganda.

What if what you think is opposing Jew wars is, when applied as you believe it, something that will lead to Jew wars, or more Jew wars?