SumerBreeze

faggot clubs

TwitterBannedIt

sounds about right.

Quicktor

You god damn right...Jeff Bezos just bought David Geffens Beverly hills estate for $165 million...homies...

Sodomy and torture rules the world right now...the battle is real...

crazy_eyes

theres a cemetery nearby that has a jew section

pby1000

OK. My understanding is that Cain was fathered by YHWH/Jehovah, or the Lord God of Genesis 2. The father was not the Serpent or Lucifer. I am pretty sure that the Serpent and Lucifer are different beings, one or both of them being female. Probably the Serpent is female or androgynous and this is why she is depicted with a snake. There is enmity between the seed of Eve and the seed of the Serpent.

Cain built the first city and is the first Mason. The Masons revere Tubalcain, his sister Namaah, Ham, Canaan, Nimrod, etc. These people are all of the line of Cain.

Seth was fathered by Adam with Eve, and Jesus is of this bloodline.

There are six different bloodlines. The Pharaonic bloodline enslaved the Jews and got them to sell their souls in exchange for power in this world. This is one reason they rejected Jesus, who offered salvation in another world.

ICarryHotSauce

The serpent is Lilith. The first mason is Hiram Abiff, architect of Solomon's Temple, although they also credit Akhenaten as the first mason, spiritually at least. Freud wrote that Moses was Akhenaten, a belief lots of jews into esoteric knowledge believe, including the Rothschilds. The Pharanoic bloodline is the tribe of Levi, expelled from Egypt for their jewing. They were the wealthiest and most powerful group in Egypt, yet they complained about oppression and that they were slaves. The second in command behind Pharoah was one of these deceivers. This tribe was the only jewish tribe with no land, so they must've come in as foreigners and jewed heir way into riches. They were the priestly tribe and wrote the Old Testament, and demanded offerings in exchange for their magic. There was no one single religion in the area, which the Old Testament constantly kvetches about, and no one single people. The word 'jew' is a bit of a misnomer because there were 12 tribes. The subversive one was the tribe of Levi. The other tribes worshipped Moloch though by burning children alive, so it's not like there was a good one.

pby1000

Is Lilith the mother of Cain? So, Lady Gaga, Madonna, etc. are used to depict Lilith.

Yes, I have heard that Hiram Abiff is the first Mason. I have also heard that Nimrod was. What is the relationship of Hiram Abiff to Cain?

I am thinking that Cain is the first Mason because he built the first city.

And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch. Genesis 4:17.

I hear the name Levi coming up quite a bit. Did you see that short film produced by Alefantis? It is called Chapel Perilous and is about Moses having horns. The character who plays Moses is named Levi.

Chapel Perilous:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j-Bbbck2Nk

Thank you for the information.

redwing14

what do you mean? they have all seeing eyes on their tomb stones?

Barfin

lot of freemason sylbolism

crazy_eyes

photos of what?

OutlawCountry

If you only knew how bad things really are.

VoatContainmentGuard

Its the mark of the demon jew.

70times7

Whats their plan?

Cause as many as they can to lose salvation.

TwitterBannedIt

This is where the doctrine loses me, when it expects me to ignore that this makes no sense.

How is that profitable for humans, if inhuman or spiritual, then how would such an entity profit? Genuinely troubled by those questions and the assertions made.

70times7

This is where what doctrine loses you?

TwitterBannedIt

Doctrine is a codification of beliefs or a body of teachings or instructions, taught principles or positions, as the essence of teachings in a given branch of knowledge or in a belief system.

The doctrine you were describing when you said that there exist people that wish to cause others to lose salvation. The Christian Doctrine. A fine one as far as they go, but the notion of desiring another to lose some abstract concept of salvation, seems rather silly and fantasy driven.

70times7

Was speaking of baphomet worshipers the op talked about. The illuminati, skull n bones, free masonry etc.

Those groups goal, is to deceive mankind into losing their salvation.

Not sure how you brought that around to "doctrine".

TwitterBannedIt

While it is easy and readily obvious that those groups deceive, I am fairly certain they do so to attain things that are much more tangible than the 'spiritual trolling' you have described.

70times7

It is a controversy. Between God and satan. Satan hates God and his law. So he does what he can to make everyone break it as often as they can.

As a spit in Gods face.

Revealing occult knowledge to these groups which they then disseminate to the masses to put then and keep them in spiritual bondage.

That is my understanding of it anyway.

TwitterBannedIt

Ok thats fine and good, but how does one avoid the very logical question of why anyone should care about these two entities. Or why God would care, he's literally God, and why would this one thing in particular be the battle fodder, the stakes. None of it make any logical sense.

These stories made God and Satan sound like angry quarreling children and we are just supposed to accept that as the totality of how reality genuinely is.... come on...

70times7

If the perspective one looks at the "stories" is approached from the wrong angle, it can look like fantasy.

Just like advance medicine, propulsion, computer tech and other things can look like fantasy.

The main crux here when boiled down, is "if" there is an all powerful God and one of His creation turned on him, and is in the process of destroying everything good and pure, then "why" does this God not simply destroy the bad egg and restore everything to its perfect state. Why let all of creation be infected? And for so long?

Another way to word it is, why does God let "sin" exist?

A fair question. And when approached from the wrong angle, the story sounds like it must be fiction.

Like any other thing, if investigated fully the truth tends to present itself.

If you read this short study of that very question, I guarantee you will see the matter differently. Regardless of your beliefs.

https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/84.68