There’s hope for Michigan.

Like they can AFFORD that anyway.

It's a start, but...

Force

What about "Trick". "Persuade", "Manipulate", "Groom" or otherwise "Con"?

These are laws made without acknowledgement of jewish and jew-like behaviors.

There needs to be a fundamental shift in law, possibly even on the Constitutional level, that prevents the act of attempting to make one man submit to another (or corporate entity) in the form of any control system that impinges on the explicit freedoms of the individual. ie: Any form of "Slavery/Indenturment by another name or technique - even where payment is involved*". Because "Force" is an extremely nebulous term that can mean many things and be made to not mean others, the same way "Consent" is rapidly becoming meaningless through it's current year political and social morph-ability and general abuse.

We need a "this meaning does not and shall not change" addendum to our whole system of Constitutional understanding. Enslavement comes in many forms and by many names, but there should be no confusion about it's fundamental immorality and illegality, and serious punishment attached to any attempt at circumvention and subversion via ALL means - not just "Force". No devious horse-trading. No edging. No legislative nibbling away. No oblique, PR/Spin/Propaganda based attacks on fundamental rights and mores shall be entertained - no matter how "popular" and normalized the idea of ersatz slavery may be presented. Just an unbreakable freedom ethic - if you don't like the way we have things laid out, you are free to leave.

*Because the law should already be well aware of "Company Store" style Captured Economy traps where the money never really leaves the plantation/railroad/closed system enacted by the Slave masters - and the workers/slaves can only ever make enough to cover their keep (where the bosses can't get the taxpayer to cover it, of course, as per Amazon's workers-on-welfare "employment" model). Anti-Trust law supposedly fights this, though it's violated every day by multinationals and mega-corporations who make the "Company Store" system so big it envelopes whole nations (and again, engages in corporate welfare schemes where possible by being "too big to fail").

I thought you meant bill gates and then i realized even if you didnt he is helping microchip the world so

Why did a bill even need to be made???

Forcefully huh? "If you want to continue working here you have to be chipped" Now its voluntary.

Microchips are 60's tech, it's all wireless now.

Good thing employers can terminate for company policy violation, if you don't like it then leave. 1000's of José Luis Alejandro out there willing to work for less.

Outside of the military, how in the fuck can any organization, ever, for any reason, demand that you implant something inside your body?

This is absolutely mind-boggling. The fact that they would even consider it necessary making this illegal indicates that the legality of this would be the default mode. There are American men and women who sign up for the military to "spread freedom" in the Middle East where they are neither wanted or needed. They risk their lives to interfere in foreigners business, while shit like this goes on at home. I'm honestly surprised that non of them would rather test the effectiveness of the fire insurance of the companies who manufacture this evil, their warehouses and offices.

where on earth can we live and start a fresh community.