ScannerDarkly

Nano thermite was used to cut the beams for controlled demolition. It was not used to vaporize the building.

Unchosen1

So where is all the debris then? If it wasn't vaporised, where did it go?

ScannerDarkly

If there was “vaporization” of the building as well, that would be done with energy weapons, not nano thermite.

Nano thermite is used for cutting steel.

Unchosen1

Ding ding ding!

ScannerDarkly

The same place it goes in all controlled demolitions. Into a neat little pile.

Unchosen1

It didn't. It disappeared. There is barely any debris at ground zero, even on the same day. The "bathtub" the towers sat in was 7 stories deep and largely undamaged. 300+ stories worth of building disappeared without enough heat or seismic activity to account for its disappearance and all that was left wasn't even enough to fill the lobby.

grandmacaesar

Where did the towers go?

On the morning of 9/12, "Robert Gurlinsky" explained to George Stephanopoulos that the towers simply fell down into the ground and were pulverized evaporated.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/e2vaCySZdmtK/

Unchosen1

It's so hilarious that that is the extent of the questioning isn't it?

nemestrinus

There were pyroclastic clouds with intense heat. There are photos of some automobiles which were parked on the street, incinerated to almost the melting point. Not as widespread as the ensuing dust clouds.

realmonster

the beams werent 1 long continuous beam from the ground to the top floor. they were sections.

Unchosen1

Is this relevant?

Each tower was 110 stories tall. The complex had a basement only 7 stories deep. The amount of debris present immediately after collapse is nowhere near enough to account for the almost 2 million tons of material.

The usual explanation is that it was pulverised and flew away in the wind somehow. But if that's the case and it was pulverised by heat, why weren't the plumes hot? If it was pulverised by impact, why was the seismic activity the same as that recorded for the demolition of much smaller building like the Seattle Kingdome?

realmonster

portal into another universe? idk, its a boring question.

a more interesting one is we know why they chose a financial capital of the US (they wanted to strike the jews) but why did they warn the jews? or did they? was israeli intelligence able to figure it out before it happened

Unchosen1

What happened is a boring question? Where the towers went is a boring question? How can you move on to figuring out the why, how or who if we can't even say "what" happened yet?

realmonster

are you suggesting an alternate 9/11 dimension? how is "where did the material go?" relevant to anything?

I can tell you what didn't happen. 100,000,000 space jews didn't quickly dismantle large portions of the tower and beam it up in to space.

Unchosen1

I'm suggesting that it had to go somewhere. It didn't disappear into another dimension. Are you familiar at all with Judy Wood and her evidence?

realmonster

do you have any suggestions?

Unchosen1

Yes I do!

Here's her 2012 presentation:

https://youtu.be/8jC9W2vbyrs

It's long, but after watching the first 15 minutes of the presentation I was intrigued enough to watch the whole thing. Once you see it, it's difficult to unsee.

realmonster

Okay, I watched to the 16 minute mark. So you're suggesting the material was pulverized and scattered to the wind? Having mixed concrete myself and having demolished blocks of concrete, I can concur with your suggestion. I still don't know why you posted this thread with a question as the topic title when you already knew the answer.

Unchosen1

My title is a question based on the current "mainstream" consensus that the buildings were demolished in a controlled fashion using nano-thermite, and it's that nano-thermite and the impact with the ground that accounts for the lack of sufficient debris (it was pulverised somehow - it's not there). The problem is that there isn't enough evidence of heat (needed to vaporise) or seismic activity (needed to crush).

To save you the rest of the video (thanks for actually watching and responding btw), the premise is that the destruction was caused by some kind of free energy beam (think Tesla) that caused the structure to mostly "dustify" without heat or pressure.

realmonster

going by her logic we know that the "what" is there was a WTC and then there wasnt a WTC. so here were talking about the "how", but this method of thinking doesnt mean you ignore everything in the "why" category because youre going to have to come up with answer for that "why" and if you cant, you have to take a step back and consider the other "how"s. its especially relevant here because of how similar the event was to exactly what we were being told. at that point "why?" is a pretty important question.

ill admit that if we are ONLY looking at "how" then xyz future weapon is a possibility as much as controlled demolition and jet fuel totally being able to melt steel beams in a giant crucible. but, if the answer to "why" is just testing a new future weapon, one which would necessitate many industry revolutionizing technology breakthroughs then why would they be sitting on their asses with this tech for 20 goddamn years doing literally nothing with it.

that "why" doesnt make sense, you have to go back and look at the other options

Cunty84

The heat was in the steel frames.

Unchosen1

Huh? Were the steel frames insulated? What happened to all that steel? If it vaporised, why wasn't the vapour hot?

Cunty84

The military set it up w/ Mossad, they’re capable of kiking anything to get their way.

Unchosen1

You're not answering my question. I'm not interested in "who" yet, just "what". I'm trying to figure out how the "mainstream conspiracy" narrative of nano thermite being used to destroy WTC1 & 2 accounts for the lack of observed evidence of the heat that must have produced.

There are no photos of a believable amount of debris at ground Zero. The official story is that it was vaporised or that it was crushed into powder but there was no heat and no seismic activity to match either.

So where did the towers go?