CaptThorazine

Search for the word "Holocaust" in Indeed. The perpetuation of the Holocaust is an industry.

Rockfish1000

“The Holocaust is a deeply anchored belief even in people who know very little about it. We can see that not only does disbelief in the Holocaust myth threaten modern Jewish identity as shaped by political Zionism, but for others it brings into question the credibility of those in authority who told everyone it was true: the state, the churches, the schools, and media of every kind. These sources are the same ones people trust and depend on every day for information. If these trusted authorities are wrong about the Holocaust, what else are they wrong about? What other dishonesties are they promoting

I understand the reasoning here, but when I attempt to redpill someone, I do it the opposite.

"If we have already established to your satisfaction that a vast majority of what we know about the reality of the world is bullshit and lies, why the fuck are we supposed to believe that somehow despite it all, THIS narrative is the ONE narrative that is 100% true as gospel? "

Rockfish1000

The science is settled. 97% of scientists agree that burning 6,000,000 jews is a carbon threat to our environment and a catalyst for climate change that requires socialist financing for large government bureaucracies. Checkmate, ClimateCaust Deniers!

Psalm19_1

Great argument and very funny. However, when talking to someone who believes in the theory of carbon dioxide influencing climate change, it is worth mentioning the document from which it began. The 1997 Kyoto Protocol described the mythical layer of carbon dioxide accumulating in the stratosphere as the cause of warming and creating the greenhouse effect. None of the idiots who signed up for it noticed that carbon dioxide is heavier than the air and accumulates at the surface of the earth, where plants and algae can take it for photosynthesis rather than in the stratosphere.

Rockfish1000

Yeah. The main thing I noticed about Climate Change Denial canards is that they employ the same M.O. as Holocaust Denial canards. They start the assumption that their conclusion is a priori truth without actually being able to back up their assertions when questioned. When questions get too hard, they resort slurs and ad hominems: "Denier" "Racist" "Idiot".

Then after they have "totally owned" you, they go into pigeon chess mode while you slowly begin to hate them.

Seventh_Jim

Bbbut but but I saw a giant pile of shoes. It must be real!