wrathfulmomes

Lots of assumptions in there. Diagnoses vs death rate for example. He says they must be idagnosing more things that aren't killing people.

That's absurd. We can be diagnosing more actual cases. That doesn't mean those cases didn't already exist and have the same chance of death. It diesn't mean they weren't real cases.

Now "covid", cases, that's demonstrably bullshit...

Having said that, I will be aggressively pursuing "alternative" (historical) treatments and trying to minimize massively invasive and/or toxic ones if at all possible.

Lexx19

What do you mean demonstrably bullshit?

wrathfulmomes

  • PCR test has abysmal specificity and amplified sensitivity 5 to 20 cycles past the threshhold at which the results are unusable. Studies have shown between 2/3 to 97% FALSE positive rate.
  • Even a true positive is not for "coronavirus" because it uses only a few primers, one of which is the same as Human Chromosome #8, shared with many other life forms. That's why the goat, fruit, and apple juice tested positive.
  • Even if it found a virus or bacteria, it can be positive for any current bacteria or virus, or PAST infections.

Basically, it's worthless except for raking in cash at $19,000 per diagnosis and another $39000 for ventilation IIRC.