nobslob

Do you really want people gullible enough to take an untested experimental new vaccine reproducing?

Soyboy69

All women are gullible, but we need them for breeding.

Gravspeed

Maybe not all, but a high enough percentage to be scary.

paralentor

They'll frame the narrative that now you can go to orgies and confidently have a rewarding career in amateur porn. Besides all the vaccines have hiv so your going to need all the money for the cocktail of drugs to keep it from turning into full blown aids.

Maat4u

Jews and niggers should get the vaccine then. We wouldn’t want to be racist would we?

Kennedyclark

Wormwood is already in the water.

QuestionEverything

YOU GUYS HIT A NERVE. \

Which just shows you're on the right track.

Does the WHO engage in world sterilization/depopulation schemes? YES, it's been proven in MULTIPLE countries.

FACT.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320641479_HCG_Found_in_WHO_Tetanus_Vaccine_in_Kenya_Raises_Concern_in_the_Developing_World

verboten

This is easy-to-debunk. People who spread this fake news say that the vaccine was not tested with pregnant women. That's only half true: none of the women who participated in the trials were pregnant at the start of the trials. In the trials of both of the mRNA vaccines, some women got pregnant. Almost equal numbers in the vaccinated group and the placebo group. There is no difference with or without vaccination.

Wattersun

What's the sample size of women who got pregnant you're basing your scientifically derrived opinion from

verboten

The Moderna trial was with 30k people, the Pfizer trial with 43k. 5 to 6 pregnancies occurred in each group (vaccinated and placebo). The mass trials (phase 3) began in July, so we will see in a few moths if the vaccines are safe for pregnant women. What we have already seen is that the vaccines don't suppress pregnancy.

Wattersun

A sample size of 12~ is not enough to draw that conclusion. All it proves is that it's not a 100% suppression rate. Unfortunately you've already made the claim that "There is no difference with or without vaccination." and it's premature

ilovejuices3

Getting pregnant doesn’t mean the same as maintaining a pregnancy with a healthy placenta and healthy baby.

verboten

Yes, we should wait with mass vaccinations until we can see the long term effects. But the pregnancies have proven that the inferile-scaremongers are flat wrong.

ilovejuices3

Both of those sentences are contradictory

verboten

Even I, as a German, don't need a dictionary to look up "infertile" - how comes that you need one? A woman is infertile if she has not conceived after 6-12 months of contraceptive-free intercourse. If a woman is pregnant she has conceived, if she can conceive she is not infertile. If women get pregnant after they got the first shot in the trials, they could conceive and the vaccine hasn't made them infertile. Already got 11 downvotes for this simple English lesson, is this the Voat kindergarten here?

ilovejuices3

Cool. Now change the word “infertile” for the phrase “recurrent pregnancy loss” and that should ease your anal retention

Men13

If next year women still get pregnant, will you admit you were wrong and have 0 understanding of how the world works?

I mean, you're claiming this vaccine that a shit ton of people are going to take sterilizes women.

If it turns out it doesn't - will you have the introspection to check how you could be so wrong?

Wattersun

I think the infertility idea comes from when the gates foundation admitted to injecting women with birth control and calling it vaccinations. Cba to find the article

Men13

No. What he said is that vaccinating people will reduce birth rates.

And that's completely true. Reducing child mortality has been shown to reduce birth rates.

Not because of "fertility issues" but because if you are less afraid your existing children will die, you are less likely to make extra children.

People intentionally use that out of context to spread fear, and people like you fall for it.

dassaer

So according to Gates, we will see a reduction in the world population rate , through vaccination, by having 'less children die', you are too dumb to see the obvious disconnect ... how does the overall rate reduce, when presumably more 'at risk children' are surviving ?? ....

Men13

Because that's how it works across all the world you fuck head!

Not only through different countries, but also through time for each country.

The higher the child mortality rate, the higher the pregnancy and birth rates!

That's just... Do you even have eyes? Can't your see that's how reality works??

Shit holes with high child mortality have huge families with a ton of children. Not only in Africa - but in the US 200 years ago vs. now, or europe in the middle ages vs now.

Even in the US today - counties with higher child mortality have bigger families.

Do you ever try to actually use the brain God gave you??

Fucker

dassaer

So you're telling me that, 'Shit holes with high child mortality have huge families with a ton of children....', which is undeniably the leading global contributor to the high population rate, will somehow stop having huge families simply bc MORE of their children in these large families will have a lower mortality rate and live longer ??? .... Wahahaaa, that's some joo-thinking right there, whut a cum guzzler. I got a bridge to sell ya and a vaccine for you to take ....

Men13

So you're telling me that, 'Shit holes with high child mortality have huge families with a ton of children....', which is undeniably the leading global contributor to the high population rate, will somehow stop having huge families simply bc MORE of their children in these large families will have a lower mortality rate and live longer

Yes, that is exactly what I'm telling you.

That's how reality works. Like it's not even a question. We have centuries of data from all over the world.

That's how people work. When kids die early, parents have many more AND are less attached to them (because they often die)

When kids don't die, parents Allie themselves to get attached and don't feel the need to have many of them (because it's a physical drain)

Not only in humans BTW. It's the same in animals as well.

That's how the world works , and I'm sorry reality clashes with your views. Might be time to change your views.

dassaer

Hahaha, duh, you forget one thing and it's the most obvious disconnect you miss on this whole 'muh vaccines' reduce population argument and that's they already have these large families and now presumably ALL their children are gonna live longer, that's all, totally lmao at you silly suckers...

ilovejuices3

And if it turns out they are correct ?

Men13

Then I'll admit I'm wrong and the deep state exists.

bruhbruhbruhbruh

Why does it matter if some guy on the Internet admits they were wrong?

What if he’s right?

Michael Yeadon (the ex chief of science at Pfizer) suggested that this might be a side effect in women.

Men13

On the side that doesn't result in hundred of thousands of people dead.

pauly_pants

Who is gonna die from that guy not admitting he's wrong next year? Tell us what you know to prevent this tragedy.

Men13

If he convinces people to not take the vaccine, is imagine a few people might die, yes.

To prevent that tragedy, all you have to do is NOT spread lies about the vaccine.

pauly_pants

I don't think there is much demographic overlap between voat users and people at risk of dying from covid.

thebearfromstartrack

Fornicators will REJOICE at this BLESSING!

2fat2move

Swyer already cant get naturally pregnant though they pretend to get nocked up and get abortions.

mememeyou

ZOG & Faceberg shitting their pants to hide this, calling it fake news:

Fact check: A false post on social media claims COVID-19 vaccine causes infertility in women

The image , a screenshot of what appears to be a news article, declares the vaccine is "female sterilization," according to an unidentified Pfizer head of research. How exactly this is accomplished is through a protein contained in the vaccine, one integral for placenta formation.

Our ruling: False

We rate the claim that the COVID-19 vaccine causes female infertility as FALSE because it is not supported by our research. The claim originates from a petition filed by Drs. Wolfgang Wodarg and Mike Yeadon, the latter an ex-employee of Pfizer who last worked with the company in 2011. The protein mentioned in the claim, syncytin-1, is important for placenta formation, but it bears no resemblance to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein save a very small amino acid sequence . Experts agree this similarity is not enough to trigger an immune response leading to female infertility.

While the vaccine has not been tested in pregnant women , there are over 44,000 COVID-19 cases among pregnant women in the USA. Any indication of an adverse immune reaction related to syncytin-1 would manifest in pregnancy complications or miscarriages; thus far, none has been reported.

Tekedo

Thus far, none have been reported

Well yeah, no shit, no one had gotten the vaccine before this article was written.

Anyone who believes this trash is retarded.

Wattersun

The article is saying since no one who has covid has reported pregnancy complications, the vaccine won't cause pregnancy complications. It's a pretty dumb reason to say the vaccine doesn't cause infertility