some serious proof

Yes, well, when you use terms like proof or evidence , you're actually referring to conventions like debate or trials , where opposing viewpoints are allowed to be presented.

How anyone can believe they've seen or heard all of the evidence re: the Holocaust when people are still sitting in prison for the crime of challenging its veracity is incredible.

It's called speaking truth to power.

You can speak truth to all of these other things, but if it doesn't change the power, then it doesn't change the world. So what's the point?

And it's not like challenging the Holocaust doesn't see people shut you out. At least by challenging the very Jewish news media, you're challenging something that can be easily examined and seen to be real.

The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection.

Nothing to do with the fact that the media is jew? Seriously?

This is classic gatekeeping, folks. You put out a lot of material to encourage people to see you as credible, but stop short of the truths that must not be made currency. In this case, Rivero will be happy to talk about how the Holocaust was bullshit, how 9/11 was a false flag, or how that al Qaeda ring was revealed to be all Jew... but it being a very Jewish news media? That fact that is most damning, whose telling is critically vital if we should ever want to lose the grip these monsters have over our society?

No, he's content to just let that slide.

No one has benefited from 9/11 except for the Zionist regime.

Again, /u/xeemee put me onto this article. Well worth a peruse.