Yes, inevitably. And I've heard from a reliable source that the fire was started by ISIS. With help from Putin.

Just kidding... I'm pretty sure OP was blaring sarcasm.

Why is it always good vs. evil with these idiots?

Have a drop of decency and argue your point like you're also a human being (one of us).

The 25th floor was shared by CIA, DOD, and IRS. Maybe that tells you something.

Troves of evidence/files where destroyed along with the building, possibly covering up numerous other cases/crimes by the state. Either way, WTC7 collapsing was convenient for the security agencies in multiple ways.

Eg: from november, 2001; http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-cia-lost-office-in-wtc/

This fire is definitely equivalent to the one with burning jet fuel after a jet smashed into the side of it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkPRskciqVM

Regardless of the physics of it, we know the government had prior knowledge of the attacks and refused to stop it. We know the government had previously funded and trained Osama Bin Laden. You can go back and forth about the physics forever, but the fact of the matter is that it doesn't matter if a plane, dynamite, or a ball of spaghetti hit the towers, it's that the government knew and didn't stop it, in fact they funded it and caused it themselves.

Well, that's because none of us know... Whether it was the CIA or NSA who had to get covered, or it was the building owner (a billionaire), or some other reason we'll probably never really know -- but at least it's certain that Bldg 7 WAS a controlled demolition, and 99% of the people don't realize that. And BTW, the Pentagon was a missile not a plane, and the flight over Pennsylvania was a hole-in-the-ground, not a plane. Obviously it was a monstrous deception intended to get us into Afghanistan and Iraq, and very very few except "the insane" seem to believe it.

Basement of building 7 had a vault with 300 billion in gold bars, among other things.

I bet your one of those people that called everyone who questioned the NSA a tinfoil hat conspiracy nut before snowden came forward.

This clip shows a flash as the building is falling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M31WzlmDG8k

This one while it is still standing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTotXNMkP1c

While falling, it could possibly be explained as a reflection while the building is popping out a window pane (angle changes, and reflects) but you would see alot more reflections if that were the case due to the amount of windows. Or maybe an electrical surge as something on that floor is crushed. It happens before the building starts falling however, i'm more likely to accept that these are placed charges used to weaken the building.

You can see the exact same behaviour with a demolition such as this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_anYswmGMeM

The pre-fire charges initially weaken the structure before taking it down.

Some more examples of demolition charges going of:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_2_XgTicAo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYjF9WPyZfg

Nope. Buildings don't do that.

Highly unlikely, since it NEVER happened until 9/11, in the whole history of skyscrapers -- kind of incredible. And all 3 buildings went down on 9/11, including one, Bldg 7, which was obviously a false flag, a controlled demolition. A child could see that, anyone could. It's preposterous, unbelievable, as the Architects and Engineers rightly point out, all 2000 of them.