CharlesDarkly

North America should stick to humanitarian aid in this situation anyway; not guns/ammo, humanitarian aid only.

DJexs

No they shouldn't there are plenty of problems on the north american continent and that is where our resources should be spent. Until there are no more children starving on the streets of the US and and the infrastructure is no longer at a D grade they should not be aiding other countries, the US government spends more on foreign aid then they do helping the hungry, the homeless, the veterans, or the infrastructure. Why should the US be spending money to help countries when their own country is falling apart-- literally infrastructure wise--,there are hundreds of thousand of homeless, millions of children starving or not receiving proper nutrition, millions without affordable healthcare STILL, and a myriad of other problesm, so please enlighten me as to why we should send a aid when there are millions in our own country starving. Would you let your own child sit at home and starve to death while you feed your neighbors? I am fine with being generous, once we take care of our own.

CharlesDarkly

Oh, I agree with you. I meant if anything, they should only do the humanitarian aid. I think they've got zero business being there. Only underhanded business, and that shit needs to stop. Yeah, you make good points. People have forgotten that a government's primary/first priority is to its own people, stuff abroad is second, if that.

Ryanwolf

Good