What if this allowed to be done ;-)

9/11 gave the U.S. The patriot act all the survelliance to go with it.

People need are reason to allow massive amount of boots on the ground. What better reason that city wide terror?

aw shucks :-)

These two texts I exchanged with my ex (right after the attacks) probably won't help:

"Emotion is prevailing over reason. Europeans refuse to abandon the idea that all cultures are equal, should be celebrated and held above criticism. It's cultural and genetic suicide."

"They [true muslims] believe that they cannot enter their heaven if pork is mingled with their flesh. I would like to rape them with pork (ie anal penetration with porcine matter). I would like to stab them and push pork in to their wounds. I would like to let them know what it was, and then watch as they die in agony believing that they will just end, and not enter their perverted heaven.

If we did this, then the next wave of attackers would not walk around so brazenly talking and reloading. They would want to kill themselves as quickly as possible because they would know that every moment increases their chances of permanently losing heaven (which is their only goal - this world to them being but a gateway to true existence). In all cases we must understand the enemy so as to formulate effective counteraction strategies. In this case the most effective deterrent is publicly showing that attackers will never enter heaven if caught.

In fact swine oil for coating bullets exists. No idea why it isn't standard anti-terror issue. It would put the fear of mortality back in to these walking dead death worshipers."

which is what both the governmental regimes and the muslims want. the latter because they inherently despise individualism and feel much more at home when they are being told what to say, think and do by some draconian, ever-present overlord.

Yeah... but with only "human shield" troops, they can't really hold territory effectively. This is pretext to a major escalation.

This is clearly a false flag event meant to provoke a "necessary response" with a "coalition of the willing" to send troops to Syria. You will see this announced by weeks end.

The article makes a good point, ISIS was created by NATO, and has been funded by the US for years. Are they really an autonomous terrorist organization? I see strong evidence to suggest otherwise.

at worst perhaps the sec agencies knew this was going to happen and they let it. given that there are 300M muslims hell-bent on the destruction of western civilisation there's no need for a false flag. you just let them get on with it.

They have pulled so many false flag attacks in the past, the most recent being the "chemical weapons" that Assad didn't use. You'd be an idiot not to at least explore the possibility.