0xD00D

Your logic is all messed up here. A terrorist attack on US soil would put Donald Trump in office. The country would quickly descend to a form of Nationalism not seen since the Third Reich in Germany. There would be internment camps, and mass deportations.

Obama/Hillary neither needs nor wants a terrorist attack on US soil. To understand the psychology of letting in so many refugees, understand that Obama and liberals cut from his cloth are firm believers in multiculturalism. There is nothing wrong with multiculturalism as a philosophy. However, it may have hidden dangers in the case of muslims who refuse to integrate into American society.

goatboy

Terror attacks are just one type of hammer in the tool box of transnational progressives. The goal is the total destruction of the old world order- with no national identities, no distinct races, exactly 2 classes (the Pharaoh class and slave class), and population controlled by the Pharaoh class. The slave class are to be farmed like cattle.

draaaak

Um, duh. Then he and his buddies/masters can push the big brother police state even harder. Remember, his goal for next year is gun control.

JackDinn

thought that was common knowledge, but yea as has been said Barry is just a stuffed suit.

modifieddevice

oh no,Black Lives Matter is his secret project that is gaining steam,I used the term brown shirts but red guard fit better,yeah he wants to stir up anger and the general masses will turn on him that is when his private army moves in,just like they are doing now,you can't rebuke them because they have named themselves perfectly.Obama is playing Mao Zedongs revolution here,that is his game.

In_Cog_Nito

Dammit. Obama needs fighting-age Syrian men to flee Syria so the conquest of Syria faces little resistance. He doesn't give a flying fuck about the occasional minor terrorist attack.

sec

However- it would also create a MUCH stronger resistance towards immigration.

An attack happened in Paris France, and look at the push back already.

Let alone on American soil...

Obama is simply a moron. He is a puppet government, with no true ties to America- which is why he doesn't give a shit. And now that things are falling off the rails, he, nor anyone else has the ability to control the on going collapse of American culture/economy.

BloodFox

  • Under Obama, the CIA spied on the Senate.

  • Americans died at Benghazi because Obama’s administration didn’t take their repeated requests for additional security seriously.

  • George W. Bush quit playing golf in 2003 because he didn’t want the mother of some fallen soldier to see the Commander-in-Chief out playing golf. He also said he thought playing golf during a war sent the wrong signal to the American people. Through June of 2014, Obama was up to 177 rounds and is on pace to play twice as much in his second term as his first term.

  • 11,472,000 Americans Have Left Workforce Since Obama Took Office
  • He’s responsible for the dumbing down of our education system with Common Core.

  • He’s the reason why countless Americans have been groped, molested and harassed by the TSA, even though agents never caught a terrorist sticking their hand down anyone’s pants.

  • The website portion of Obamacare, healthcare.gov, was a non-functional disaster for months when it rolled out and Obama claimed he was completely unaware that there was anything wrong with it.

  • Veterans received poor health care and even died because of the incompetence and cover-ups of Obama’s VA.

  • Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan “described himself as mujahedeen” and yelled “Allahu Akbar” as he murdered 13 of his fellow soldiers. As Commander-In-Chief, do you agree with the Department of Defense report that labeled that killing as “workplace violence” or was that an act of terrorism?

  • Instead of calming people down, Obama helped to turn Americans against each other racially be inserting himself into the Trayvon Martin case.

  • When he was running for office, Obama called Bush “unpatriotic” for adding so much to the debt and promised to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term. Yet, the national debt is up 7 trillion dollars since Obama became President. That’s more debt than all U.S. Presidents from George Washington through Bill Clinton combined.

So no, we have no more human companionship or patience anymore, especially for such a stupid and arrogant president. If anything more people should be rioting in the streets for the recklessness the Obama administration has driven down on this country.

Lag-wagon

What if I want everyone in the country to send me 1 dollar...

CarlosShyamalan

Why would he need refugees for a terrorist attack?

Drenki

It's more likely to get more Democratic voters.

The way I see it, the Left has achieved pretty much everything they have been advocating for the past 75+ years, they have nothing left to "change", no more causes to celebrate. So the strategy is now to get as many people as they can to vote blue for a lifetime.

luckyguy

It will also give them more ground to take our rights away and spy on us. If we want the US constitution to last 500 years from now intact then we need to recognize that we need to not give ground dispite events like Paris will happen in the 100s between now and then. Paris is a small event historically speaking. We can't yield for such a frequent event. We have to address it with the tools we already have. We've had these sort of things happen before and they got the tools they wanted. Despite that things aren't going to be perfect so they don't get more each and every time.

If we don't want the constitution to last 500 years that understandable. If so then I say we roll it up now and revoke the powers it authorizes as well.

PardiGras

Just looking at consequences of terror attacks and the resulting incentives for leaders, it wouldn't be unreasonable to say that every politician is at least amenable to an attack, or to take a step further even hoping for one.

What happens during an attack? Do politicians or any of their family/friends/elite compatriots ever get killed in them? Nope, they're all safely insulated and protected by every human and technological security measure possible. And they wouldn't be caught dead (pardon the pun) in crowds with all the common folk, aka ideal terrorist targets.

And as far aa the aftermath, you'd think any politician would have their career ruined by having an attack place on their watch, but in reality it's the exact opposite. They're hailed as heroes for their knee-jerk legislation and war mongering after the fact, we've seen it with bush and obama most recently but there are examples going back to before the US was even a country.

If the country's response to an attack was collective self-reflection on what policies and actions caused a group to want to attack us to begin with, and then a change in those policies, then we might actually see a decline in terrorism. But of course our response, from the native americans all the way up to now has always been to condemn the savages for threatening our obviously superior way of life, and dig in our heels even harder. To give the already oppressive government even more power, and hand over even more taxpayer money to war profiteers.

I think of politicians the same way I think of billionaire businesses magnates, not as evil masterminds rubbing their hands together at the thought of how many people they're going to screw. But rather they're highly motivated people in a system that rewards sociopathic behavior with massive wealth and power. Both groups literally have convinced themselves that they're helping the populous, and that's why they're so succesful. Anyone who opposes them is just misguided or ignorant.

It's easy to vilify them but it's just a cop out that removes the responsibility from the complacent people that refuse to do what needs to be done.

It's right in everyone's faces that loss of life and property are the 2 things that motivate people on a mass scale. When it's done to the masses it's called taxation and law enforecement. When it's done by them it's called theft and terrorism. When that's the basis of our system no one can be surprised when the multitudes end up slaving their lives away enriching the lucky few.

The only people to blame are the masses who willing support it

pitenius

there are examples going back to before the US was even a country.

I'm not disagreeing, but I'd appreciate the history lesson. I know that Paine's claims of "Indian attacks" in Common Sense was a bit specious. I think you might know things I don't.

response to an attack was collective self-reflection on what policies and actions caused a group to want to attack us

But Rush told me this was lefty-lib whining! :)

PardiGras

He leans very liberal, but Howard Zinns 'A Peoples History of the United States' goes into great detail about this. The various natives peoples in north, south and central america all suffered this same treatment from Columbus up to the last US President that pushed tribes onto reservations. Not only them but any rebellious slaves, I migrant workers, poor whites, unions, civil right activists, war protestors, etc. Anyone who disagrees with the status quo and actually does anything other than complain will be subject to violations of their rights at least, or outright murder at worst. It's happened so many times it can't really be seen as anything other than standard operating procedure.

When you value 'the American way of life' above the rights of any individual or group, even if that way of life is terrible for a majority of people, you can justify all kinds of atrocities against anyone who tries to change it and isn't a politician or ceo.

modifieddevice

here is a better question What if Obama ,knowing he is pushing the American people further into angered state,knowing if a major terrorist attack comes the American population would blame him and inch closer towards revolt. What if by all the unpopular policies Obama has adopted,along with covertly founding and supporting BLM as gis "brown shirts" he wants a second American revolution so he could turn the army on the population and appoint himself something akin to emperor status?

steve0suprem0

meh, there are way too many conservatives in the army.

modifieddevice

what does he need a conservative laced army for when he has a building movement within the colleges,blm? just like the Chinese Red guards.

steve0suprem0

what, those triggerkin are gonna stand up for something? they fight by whining and running to authority.

modifieddevice

I hope you are right,but they have managed to sway the media and take over numerous college campuses,these are the next generation of leaders,in the 60s they blew off the hippies and radicals but now they run the country.chew on that.

steve0suprem0

Truth, they'll take it down from within. Are doing.

greycloud

you realize that most politicians including obama are AIPAC puppets right?

2drunk

What if we all just beg Russia to nuke that place and let us have a redo?

iDontShift

nothing would please them more than actual terrorists to pickup what they started. been their dream all along...

CANCEL-CAT-FACTS

A big enough terrorist attack could lead to him appointing himself to a third term.

harddrive

Who would stop him from doing that anyway?

CarlosShyamalan

I say we should all decide on that once the primaries are over. If its clinton vs pretty much anyone other than Paul I think Obama is the worlds best bet for not fucking up as much as carli fiorina, jeb bush or clinton would do.

If there is no chance of a sane person running for either party what we need to do is damage control...

PIcasso54

Me, personally.

2drunk

But who could without committing suicide by shooting oneself in back of the head 15 times?

Rottcodd

It's not Obama per se.

As president, he's just the current point man for those who want a terrorist attack, and yes - that is because they want to continue destabilizing the Middle East. And because they want to continue expanding domestic authority.

Once you realize that those are the goals, pretty much all US middle eastern policy makes sense.

iamrage

A president, as far as I can see anyways, is appointed purely so people have someone to blame for the shit that happens. That's about it. They switch those out every couple of years (depending on the country) and continue to do their rubbish as per usual.

2drunk

As much as I hate to agree, you are correct IMHO. For at least the last 150 years the Government has not been for the people. The government has been there for entities like the federal reserve and other organizations that would rather seek to enslave the population while a select few prosper.

iamrage

And then they call us tinfoil hatters because we see the forest for the trees..

2drunk

Or because were not sidetracked by #HAES, #blacklivesmatter, #safespaces, and all the other propaganda being force-fed to us? While mass killing, child rape, more rape, human trafficking, and slavery is being overlooked cause islam?

iamrage

When you see an agenda being so aggressively pushed into your face by major media.. it's like a bomb raid alarm going off that some huge shit is about to his us without anyone knowing about it until they're already bending you over and fucking your liberties out of you.

RedditIsPropaganda23

US foreign policy matches up surprisingly well with Israel's interests.

jerry

And most other countries that are a part of the BIS