Unless you can get the liberal anti-gun idiots to stop watching TV..... NO amount of evidence will convince them. It doesn't matter HOW valid it is. They have been brainwashed by the media pushing the anti-gun agenda. These libtards hear what they want to hear which is: "guns are bad". It doesn't matter if you can prove that it was a hoax. You can't change their minds; they've already bought it.

revolt

This info is from the same source. It is from the barrel.

The more I read about this, the more I am convinced the reason 90% of us are kept in the dark isn't necessarily nefarious, but because there is currently a coup occurring within the upper levels. If word got out, the people would have a vote of no confidence and the dominoes would begin to fall - and this is the problem. Once the people wake up and demand change, it could be the fascist cabal playing the libertarian minded 'messiah' to save the country that eventually destroys it. Either way, the government is currently fighting itself for control.

LOL dude that isn't proof of shit. Can you not read? That says that for almost every sample HE IS NOT the provider. Then there is one sample that he could be, because it comes from a white person. That is the only validation they have. Your a joke.

Time and time again, it has been shown that the more information you keep from people, the more conspiracies spring up around an event.

Assuming for a second, this damp rag of a kid managed to perform this surgical special forces solo assault, the authorities have only themselves to blame for the conspiracies surrounding Sandy Hook.

I personally think that Sandy Hook stinks of false flag.

I'm not filling in gaps with imagination, you are ignoring information taken from the very documents you are bringing to the discussion. The same report you are referring to also shows that Adam's DNA was not found on the Savage Mark 2 that was allegedly used to kill Nancy Lanza or the unfired ammunition from the magazine removed from the gun. Instead it was DNA belonging to a "convicted offender" from New York, which was the same DNA found on the sealed envelope addressed to the children of Sandy Hook. So, if you're so smart and literate and such a brilliant deductive reasoner, then why are you overlooking this obvious hole in the official explanation of what happened, or didn't happen, that day? Explain why this DNA evidence does not support the official story, I dare you.

And yes, I do think it's possible that police reports, FBI reports, DNA analyses, and any other part of an investigation can be fabricated, which is completely reasonable. Why couldn't these sorts of documents be fabricated? They're just text on paper, how hard could it be? Alternatively, if the documentation from the DNA analysis wasn't fabricated, then the physical evidence itself could be tampered with prior to the analysis. It certainly wouldn't be the first time DNA evidence was tampered with/fabricated. Why is this such a ridiculous notion for you? We are dealing with a government and a collection of media outlets that have a horrible track record of representing the truth to the American people. Do you really think the mainstream media and the federal government have proved themselves to be credible? I certainly don't.

Out of curiosity, any Holocaust deniers here as well?

Adam Lanzas mom was a CFR employee who met at Bretton woods weekly.

These people are part of an ongoing conspiracy modelled after Australia: they will propagate and manufacture mass shootings until public will changes regarding private gun ownership.

We've been over this exact issue before fatty. Adam's DNA was not found on the rifle and ammunition that was allegedly used to kill Nancy Lanza, instead there was a match to a "convicted offender". This is absolutely a "smoking gun" piece of evidence because it pokes a gaping hole in the official story. If this part of the story is such an obvious lie, then why is it so unreasonable that other parts of the story, if not the whole incident, have also been fabricated? The logical answer is, it isn't. So the next step that any logical, curious, and skeptical person ought to take is to attempt to find other instances where the available evidence/information relevant to this incident does not match the official story. I recommend you give this a try, instead of continuing to post the same bullshit "debunking".

What evidence is there that this is legit? I could create an identical document that fingers Darth Vader.

Glove?

I'm from CT. Emergency responders from my hometown were dispatched to Sandy Hook. One of my good friends has a family member who lost a child. Sorry, but the conspiracy theories are pathetic. This happened in Newtown, CT, off of a major highway in the eastern reaches of the NYC tristate area--not some backwater village that might lend itself to a conspiracy.

it doesnt matter. we bought the story at the time

What is going on here? Can somebody explain?

I had never really been a conspiracy guy but this one stinks all around. No way did this really happen the way it was reported, if it happened at all, which is unlikely.

We're supposed to believe that a scrawny anorexic autistic kid who played video games all day and couldn't even tie his shoes lugged 30-40 pounds of guns and ammo into a school and skillfully slaughtered 26 people within minutes? And no security footage was released, or video of kids evacuating? Not to mention the many other inconsistencies?

Give me a fucking break.

And this conspiracy so vast couldn't fake a DNA report?

Wow.

http://ablechild.org/2014/06/24/the-sandy-hook-advisory-commission-and-the-evidence-of-a-convicted-offender/