I just heard a radio show that suggested San Bernidino was a false flag carried out, not by the US, but by Russia or allies. ( conspiracy )

submitted by William_Wallace

with or w/o Assad as a payback for the US support of Turkey in the middle east and the terrorist attacks against Russian citizens and the Russian air force. The idea was used in part to explain the WH's weak response and BH0 not having a properly prepared statement and his overall terrible speech performance. The "take the guns" talk was already prepped to be used after the next event, whatever that would be, but they weren't expecting the SB event. Thoughts?

edit: Russia would gain; 0bama looking weak with a bad response, public further turning against the Administration, and giving Trump ammo to go after Democrats, helping his election campaign, and possible helping elect a more "Russia friendly" president next year.

HighfalutinNakabear

You know there are "mothers" who kill their own children? Not that you're necessarily wrong but thats a shaky line of reasoning. Giving birth doesn't magically turn someone into a benevolent creature unable to commit violence.

Stavon

A false flag might be agreeable since it's unclear enough.

Blaming Russia, I doubt it. Russia doesn't want more presence of the US the middle east. They even keep to only insult and threat Turkey after the SU-24 shootdown.

Some party who would like more US involvement is IMO more likely the culprit. Or some party within the US who would profit.