Got to question the underlying narrative being peddled here. Why is it Turkey that's getting so much attention all of a sudden? Why is nobody really questioning NATO and the West's complicity in letting this go on for over a number of years? I mean, if the US allegedly has satellites that can see a Russian missile launcher shoot down an airliner over the Ukraine why can't they spot all these oil refineries, trucks and ISIS bases in Iraq and Syria?

I find it funny that as soon as Russia enters the conflict all this 'truth' about Turkey suddenly comes out. So is this about deflecting attention away from something else or is there some form of regime change desired and is this simply evidence it is being pursued? Of course it could be for both reasons. Or neither for that matter.

Anyway, not only do I find it difficult to trust articles from anonymous reporters that use single unnamed sources (especially ISIS terrorists) as the premise for their arguments, but I also question why the Erdogan regime is seemingly now being thrown to the dogs, and which new 'ally' will finally be substituted in its place.