I do see the picture, thank you for the reply!!:)

Search youtube for 9/11 thermite.

TLDR would be that the bright orange glow from the melted material shown in several different 9/11 videos is consistent with steel/iron being melted. Steel/iron cannot be melted by jet fuel so the government said that it was actually aluminum that was molten in the videos which has a much lower melting point and also the aircraft that hit the building was 80% aluminum. The counter argument to aluminum being molten in the videos is that aluminum does not glow bright orange but stays silver. The government countered that argument saying it was molten aluminum + office furniture. No results have been replicated showing that any kind of objects mixed with molten aluminum give off a fiery orange lava type texture that is shown in the 9/11 videos. The debate has not gone beyond this point.

I upvoted @OmniscientGiraffe because he/she politely answered a question and contributed to the discussion. I downvoted you for adding nothing to the conversation but backhanded insults.

To an extent yes. I wouldn't include a lot of military advancements like stealth technology for an example. But for the majority of things I would agree. More openness and discussion would promote a better relationship with the general public.

That's not even what I'm saying. I was giving background on the subject. Furthermore it's not the tool, but how it's used.

http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0674/6413/products/patch_large.jpg?v=1414456928

http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0674/6413/products/1b106a4e2e2de02d9b6e5ebc7aeee4d8_large.jpeg?v=1420146420

You seem to over-complicate things bro, CNN does that to your brain, are you pro Obama as well?

You can't implicitly trust any source of information, really.

Read what's written. Check out sources. Learn which sources tend to be more or less reliable.

At that point, you can take the information offered and make an informed decision. Be flexible, though, information changes and something you decided wasn't or was true may turn out to be the opposite with more information.

In a healthy nation it does not make sense to hurt your own.

In a sick empire it does not matter. They see people as cattle, lemmings. The people who orchestrated it, are not our people. Study who controls the media. What is Aipac and ADL. How do they constantly work against us and exploit us.

What the fuck are you talking about? you ok?

a lot of them!

Do you work for the NSA ?

Most of the chem trail business is directed at airlines. Cloud seeding is a process to increase precipitation where it's needed. In the us I have hear of ski resorts doing it to increase snowfall

You need to read about Maximilien Robespierre and terrorism to realize not only how old terrorism is, but how and why governments use it against their own citizens in order to enact change in some shape or form. Unfortunately, it's extremely effective.

Did he tell you himself he's not a lizard person?? Or was it his friends that told you? Hahah you seem so smart I didn't even read after your first 2 "facts"

The government is run by FOREIGN interests. When all it takes is money (lobbying) to give to congressmen then the person who gives the money is in control of whatever policy is written by law. If the people giving the money are Saudi's then the Saudi's are in control. The entire American government from the bottom to the top has been compromised over the past 50 years and even though American's still hold all the government titles, the foreigners who put them there (or paid for them to be in power) are in control behind the scenes.

Once you understand that the entirety of the US government is run by foreigners and not Americans you can start to accept more easily things like 9/11 was caused by people inside the US government.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1biKeaOH3qc

Anthrax is made by the US military. It cannot be made by "terrorists living in caves".

There is video and scientific proof thermite was used on 9/11 to bring the buildings down which is only made by the military.

Even if the truth is scary, it is how you perceive things that matters :) So be happy regardless

Probably a few of them, maybe 1 in 30 are bang on the money. As for the majority there's some truth in them but a lot of the time people make poor connections or really try and make the scene fit the picture in their heads.

The government being in on 9/11 has enough evidence that it's very likely that the intelligence agencies were involved at multiple levels and especially in the aftermath but the most popular theory is that the US intelligence agencies had some plans and names and were setting up some small scale terror attacks to kick off a war when the whole thing got way out of hand when they lost control of the operation, especially in how many planes they managed to hijack. The more insidious aspect is how the government embraced the pain and capitalised on the event before all the corpses had even been found.

What are some that you think are objectively true, which other people don't seem to want to accept?

You'll sleep better when you accept it all as true, because it is...

all? no. a lot? yes!

Is it all true? No. There are many conflicting theories that point in different directions, but like a crowd of people guessing a specific answer to a problem and all coming up with answers near the truth, the average of all the guesses is probably true or at least mostly true.

For example does jet fuel melt steel beams, no. Are there shape shifting lizard people living in a hollowed out Earth that General Richard Byrd met with in the 40s and 50s... probably not. Most likely he was looking for ways to claim and exploit Antarctica's vast hydrocarbon reserves and hold them in store until the technology to extract the reserves was economically feasible.

In terms of 9/11- to be able to create justification for a stateless war (in other words, a war not against a nation, but an "entity" aka "war on terror"). War is a HUGE money making industry. A stateless war allows them to say "the enemy is always out there somewhere and always on the move, and we must always fight them, no matter where they are." They've created their own justifications to be able to invade sovereign nations while at the same time keep the local (US) populace under control. The perpetual state of fear in the that the boogeyman is right around the corner about to get us and we HAVE to let the authorities do EVERYTHING they can to stop them, even if it means giving up our rights in the process. Because, they're keeping us safe from the terrorists. It's all about money and control.

Since that is the only conspiracy you specifically mention, it is the only one I will address. However, as you said, there are a LOT of them out there. Some have legitimate kernels of truth, others are meant to distract and vilify. It takes a very skeptical and open mind to differentiate between the two.

No, all the stuff on this sub isn't true. That's why they're called conspiracy theories =P. But users will put forward theories, and it's your job to read through their research and determine for yourself what you believe is true. That's the fun of it.

/v/underreported might alter your perspective a bit.

I don't know man. I have been reading a lot, there are some conspiracies that are pretty valid, but 9/11 doesn't seem like it is one. I mean I'm a commercial pilot and I get a kick out of the Chem trail conspiraCy. It has gotten to the point of pilots making fun of it. Check out teamchemtrail.com