QuestionEverything

I suspect you are a shill, or an idiot. What's your point in contesting my facts with nonsense?

Those cameras and shots from ISS are spot on. The camera equipment is state of the art on ISS. The NOW ROUTINE method of cutting feed every time a UFO drop into the ISS camera feed is telling in itself.

I always feed doubt btw. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2920426/Nasa-cuts-live-ISS-video-feed-UFO-hovers-sight-Conspiracy-theorists-claim-space-agency-hiding-alien-life.html

un1ty

Check out the comments on this Denver news site - there's some user spouting anti-jew stuff while associating the comments with other, more plausible theories. Not too hard to spot the agent sometimes...

http://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/03/25/marijuana-edibles-blamed-for-keystone-death/#comments

mHtt

being dumb doesn't make you a liar...

QuestionEverything

You're making broad statements either to speculate or confuse.

If you want to see some UFO's just go look at all the times NASA shut off or switched the ISS live feeds. There's an ancient and advanced satellite in our orbit thats thousands of years old (Black Knight). Here's some ISS feeds: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=iss+live+feed+ufo

umatbro

Wait, They know us?

blipblipbeep

Maybe they mentioned a family to throw people off the trail.

JF_queeny

Well, thanks for making us look bad op.

Now we will have another two weeks of meetings regarding 'privacy' and 'social media'.

escapefromredditbay

this should be on top.

OWNtheNWO

All of this is prima facie to anyone who pays attention so without some smoking gun evidence of your time as a shill..

Doog

No, proof or it didn't happen .

logic_crusader

If calling bullshit on this post because of a complete lack of any evidence or proof whatsoever makes me a shill then there's nothing I can do about that. Maybe I'm brainwashed or whatever but my own judgement leads me to believe this is either a troll post or completely made up. It's not like I can just choose to believe this or not. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and people lie on the internet all the time, which is apparently what this is all about.

Proof or gtfo.

Charlie_Prime

WB, what are the work hours at this job, and how much does it pay?

Charlie_Prime

Details like this could be proof.

ideasware

Exactly my point as well -- I spend very little time there; it's a lot more like high school (or middle school or elementary school for heavens sake) recess, and I prefer voat.co to the blather over at reddit.com -- at least a little more adult.

cctv

Yeah you pretty much described the last 90 years of Public Relations. What's new is that people don't assume public opinion on the Internet is shaped in the same way as other media, because here everyone can look as true or real as you.

un1ty

What's new is that people don't assume public opinion on the Internet is shaped in the same way as other media, because here everyone can look as true or real as you.

No, what's new is that the government of the alleged land of the free, home of the brave is actively sabotaging any possible freedom users perceived they had online. Not to mention that it's one thing to write articles in a magazine that are static - its completely different when you have dynamic content voted on in an apparent organic system of approval being manipulated at its core. Whats to stop them from changing votes in an election? If they have their PR game on point, thanks to studies and studies and research like from OP, they've got it in the bag.

Charlie_Prime

Very true. Oligarchs completely underestimated the power of the Internet in the 1990's. I was a web designer back. Now they realize controlling this new media is not optional. Letting it run free could literally destroy their sweet rackets.

cctv

I agree with you that in this case the main difference is the impersonation, aka fake accounts and other cheese tactics!

EDIT: just twitter search the name of this post ("Blowing the whistle on shilling...") and you'll see what I mean.

QuestionEverything

You were never assigned UFO debunking? Interesting. I assume it's security level forbids outsourcing of that particular shilling job..

That's very telling in itself as to where the crux of this problem lies. This 'Dark government' behind the scenes, upholding whatever 'secret negotiations' were made. Corso didn't lie, and the Washington flyover in 1952 is irrefutable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toFkU3OK7pI

Careful with these posts. You don't have a side now. You can't sit on the fence. Who would you run to? FBI? CIA? You're in the beast now.

You're spreading propaganda, with US tax dollars. You'll say it's quasi legal,but technically the biggest question will be whether you are shot or imprisoned. Again, both sides will want this for you. Seriously risky.

If I were you: document, document document. Get IP's, times, everything you can that identifies their narrative. Find out who's paying the bills, where's the chain of command? Who are the customers? Follow the money.

Upload your data, share it. Torrent it. Throw it at Anonymous and civil action groups. -That's how you become a hero out of this. Otherwise, like I said. Both sides are going to want to hang you. If that's too brave for you, then gtfo. Don't support the machinery, -read your Thoreau.

Mylon

Why bother collecting all of that info? You yourself said both sides would want him shot. If he publishes too much info, the parties in question could identify him and he'll be in hot water.

QuestionEverything

The only thing I can be certain of is death. We're all going to die. Life goes on. Is where you leave better for your having been there? Or worse? Do you stand up for what is right? Or cower?

That's why.

logic_crusader

Just curious I don't really care either way. What about this post is convincing to you? If you accept what this post is saying how do you know this isn't a lie as well? Shouldn't there be some standard of proof applied here?

QuestionEverything

The existence of these shill companies/outfits has been confirmed by plenty of people. They've altered the law to make it 'legal'. They are growing steadily in size and scope.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks

http://www.rawstory.com/2011/02/exclusive-militarys-persona-software-cost-millions-used-for-classified-social-media-activities/

Ntrepid is just one of the bigger ones. These operations have been compartmentalized for damage control options beyond deniability.

Edit: Ntrepd is just another cog in a Big DOD system of quasi-gov't operations.

https://decryptedmatrix.com/trapwire-tied-to-anti-occupy-internet-spy-program-tartan-by-ntrepid-abraxas-cubic/

logic_crusader

How does that prove OP's story?

QuestionEverything

Because it does not matter. We know it's happening. Some people who might speak up may read this. They know the general reaction to expect now.. And what's expected of them.

gold_and_silver

Some form of proof would be appreciated

relative_iterator

OP, I don't believe what you say in your post but that doesn't mean the message is wrong. We should all be skeptical of the content we read. It is important to critically think for yourself and not trust everything you read online without carefully analyzing the evidence provided and even going further to see what evidence was left out.

toobaditworks

I'd love to see concrete proof of this. Everything you said basically anyone can say and has been saying.

escapefromredditbay

im not saying that OPs post kind of blows your cover. but, this post is describing something something quite true.

you shill.

edit: also, a sign pointed out in posts is a disproportionate number of up-votes, like your comment is.

toobaditworks

I still can't downvote your comment so upvotes don't matter. Shill. Ha. Funny.

Mylon

I've seen the proof myself. Reddit has had a large number of questionable content appear on the front page. It forced me to drop a lot of default subs because I was getting sick of the bullshit.

Some examples of bullshit content:

* Drug overdose pictures. They topped WTF for a whole week. Most of the top comments were, "No, this is what happens when your dealer cuts it with shitty addititves"
* K9 puppy in an oversized vest in aww. Title, "He'll grow into it." It wasn't cute. It was just outright propaganda. I think I saw this twice, at least.
* DORITOS(tm). This was a big thing a while back. I don't see it too much anymore. This agrees with OP's story about how it started as product marketing and evolved into something.
* Top post of conspiracy a week ago was an AMA about this guy spouting the most insane shit. Lots of the posts were people backing him up. Stuff including "military officers on active space missions" and 60 years of reverse engineering alien tech and more. Oddly I don't see it now, but it looked like a dedicated attempt to discredit /r/conspiracy .
* Very sudden appearance of "Snowden is an active CIA agent" posts after the John Oliver interview. Or the sudden insurgence of Oklahoma City bombing theories. Like one post that was near the top it was a grainy picture of a fenced off area with rental trucks with no context.
* Random video of some black kid ranting at his cell phone that was on videos a week ago. Basically saying, "Not all cops are bad." Who fucking cares? It only was on the front page because it was manipulated to be there.

Reddit admins cannot possibly be blind to it. Sure, people like Unidan were able to get away with manipulating the system for a long time to gain amazing exposure and popularity under the Admin's nose, but honestly he was producing quality content. If anything, the sudden demonization of the man seems suspicious (but I could accept that just being the fickle tide once his methods were exposed).

I've seen posts with 2000 upvotes and < 100 comments and that immediately throws up a red flag. Just looking at these stats alone make the post look suspicious. And then you look at the post itself and you can see that certain parties benefit by the post content.

Now is the worst time to look because it's near the end of the business day, but some suspicious posts on reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPeopleTwitter/comments/33gw5v/oh_hell_yeah/ - Almost 4000 votes and 86 comments from a sub with only 300k users. Promotes subtle racism. (Actually 3 posts from that sub in top 100. I never heard of it.)

https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/33gomx/cutest_government_worker/ - Lots of comments, but it is 8 hours old. Very much a pro-government picture. Trying to discount the fact that dog sniffing dogs are very inaccurate and are often used by cops to manufacture probable cause. In the comments, way, down, is a post 5 hours old with 25 votes with a generic response, but below that is one with 125 votes saying, "I'd let her violate my rights." Both 5 hours old. Why is the one with 5x as many votes ranked lower? Below that, with 400+ votes, "Upvoted because girl". The only posts challenging the narrative have been suppressed and ones promoting the narrative (or fulling it with mindless chatter) have been boosted.

You can find a lot more bullshit on the front page at 10 AM est. This post has already taken too much time to write, but I believe OP. Reddit has gone to shit.

escapefromredditbay

up-voted, but i trust the post.

catova

Any shills attempting to control the dialog on /r/ufo ? Seems to be a lot of debunking and insults, which push people away.

un1ty

Its McReddit - so yes.

AnalogRocks

These are tall claims and id like if you could post proof. Anyone could come on here and claim something like this. I do wholeheartedly believe shills exist on some level, but id like some reason to believe what you claim.

my_p3t_goat

geoengineering?

KoKansei

More like "demoengineering." They can't manufacture consent anymore, so now they attempt to cultivate it.