Continuation of Amalek / Mr. Mod-Erase-Face debate: Aren't all states illegitimate? ( conspiracy )

submitted by sinjinsmythe

Every state is founded on the ouster of the prior residents, kind of like what we call natural selection and part of the process of evolving, isn't it? The weaker predecessor is exploited and then absorbed or expelled. It is the process of entropy in action. That is why, Jews in Israel are no different from Americans on Native soil, or Mexicans being half Mestizo and half Spaniard, either the conqueror breeds into the culture taken over, or the weaker is marginalized and destroyed or half survives until they absorb or die off. Reservations and Occupied territories are only recent zoo-like entities arising out of feminization of reality. Nature wants the weaker societies exploited and destroyed/absorbed/evolved into the stonger.

OcculusResurrectio

I always thought that making a state legitimate was simply a group of people laying claim and defending the territory. America slaughtered the native Americans to lay claim to there own country. Ethically wrong, but right makes right. Otherwise every nation would be equal right? If you want your own state, you have to fight and defend it, or someone else will take it from you.

sinjinsmythe

Exactly, Palestinians were weak, they lost, the end. Stop whining and build something, or go piss off.

sinjinsmythe

Amalek responded to this similar post by saying something about Israel being made after 1947, but I have no idea what the year 1947 has to do with anything in reality. 1947 is a series of numbers we use to keep track of social time, but in reality is has no basis (think galaxian scale time, even Earth time it is meaningless). Why all the cultural destruction and absorption before 1947 is legit and after is not, seems completely arbitrary and nonsensical to me.

My 2 bits, anyway.