Just so we're clear, the evidence in this is a forum post with no sources identified, and a subsequent comment calling out the claimant as having taken a story from http://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=33&d=1368 and rehashed it. There seem to be allegations in the thread that stevequayle.com is mostly sensationalism. I've not heard of the website before, so it probably warrants investigation into the claims of sensationalism.

I'd like to encourage everyone to be skeptical. For now this conspiracy theory rests for me at around a 2 on the conspiracy theory rating scale .