The former Governor of Alabama, George Wallace tried similar tactics in 1968. and wasn't elected by a mile:

In a city torn by racial strife, Wallace continued tonight his practice of taunting his heck- lers, both black and white who chanted continuously as the for- mer Alabama governor spoke. Wallace supporters struck handcuffed hecklers as they were being led away by police, who did not interfere. One plainclothes policeman, using a pair of handcuffs as brass knuckles, cut the f a c e of a heckler who shoved him. Scuffles broke out even be- fore Wallace arrived, one of them during the playing of the National Anthem when Wallac- ites pummeled a group of demonstrators and tore their signs. Police used an irritating chemical spray to break up the melee. Wallace was only 20 seconds into his campaign speech, the part in which he introduces a group of Alabama labor figures traveling with him, when he unleashed his first taunt at the hecklers. In recent campaign days, Wallace has welcomed hecklers, shouting back at them to elicit exuberant cheers from his supporters.

Source

On the floor were 1,000 Wallace supporters sitting on metal folding chairs. The balconies were full with several thousand more supporters. Mondo and about 50 other protestors, mostly black, gained entry to the main floor and marched right in front of the podium charging up the crowd as shouts rang out.

Wallace delayed his entrance for nearly an hour while tempers flared from the front rows where some of Wallace’s most fervent supporters were seated. After Wallace came out to a thunderous ovation the protestors got busy and jeered nearly every word.

Soon some of the protestors began tearing up their signs and throwing the bits of paper and stick at Wallace. Mondo attempted to stop the group from pelting Wallace but was sprayed in the face with mace by an undercover policeman. Two of the other demonstrators helped Mondo outside through a side door.

Police moved in to clear the aisles and suddenly the floor erupted in violence as Wallace supporters began hitting the trapped protestors with the metal chairs. The bloody battling continued outside the Arena where $1,200 worth of windows were broken. Before the night was over the Near North Side was in riot.

Source

Sound familiar?

Socialism requires that the state control the means of production. Sanders isn't anything close to a socialist:

why Sanders is describing himself to the American electorate — of all electorates — as a 'socialist' or 'democratic socialist' isn't clear. His economics are Keynesian or Galbraithian, in common with mainstream parties of the left in the rest of the west — the Labour or Social Democrat parties. Surely 'Social Democrat' would be a more accurate and appealing label for the Sanders campaign to adopt. While Sanders claims to admire particularly the Scandinavian model, he neglects to point out that a characteristic of all social democracies is a low defence budget, reflecting not only a degree of anti-militarism, but also social spending as a priority. Beyond tinkering, though, Sanders has no appetite for significantly cutting the Herculean defence budget or criticising imperial adventures. His urging for the World's most authoritarian country, Saudi Arabia, to assert a stronger military presence in the Middle East is a bizarre position for a social democrat to hold. These odd clusters of attitudes are reflected in our placement of Sanders. Domestically the man is an undoubted progressive — not the least for his courageous attack on corporate campaign funding.

Source

"...Yet while Mr Sanders has built his campaign on a jeremiad against wealth inequality and corporate greed, he isn’t, properly speaking, a socialist—or even a democratic socialist. The better term encapsulating Mr Sanders’ positions is “social democrat”, a label that jibes with his rather mainstream embrace of “private companies that thrive and grow in America” and belief that “the middle class and the working families who produce the wealth of America deserve a fair deal”. To clarify matters, Mr Sanders flatly disavows the very heart of socialism as defined by Karl Marx: “I don’t believe government should own the means of production”, he says."

Source

You might also check out this article. http://www.dailypublic.com/articles/03092016/sanders-not-so-far-left-not-so-far-out

So he shouldn't have went to Chicago for a rally because there are minoritys? You suck bro as does your logic. Free speech is free speech. Anybody should be allowed to go to a major city. Comparing him with THE KKK for your argument is rediculous, juvenile, and most importantly shows your ignorance. Are you also saying that minorities hate white people and the American values?

https://i.sli.mg/YhyT8z.png

I think the mostly black crowd of angry people is gonna red pill many people who were on the fence for the left.

But not too scared to vote for him. If anything, it should piss more people off and galvanize more support for the donald.

I'm always hearing you guys rant about Soros. Fun Fact: Soros has spent about 20 million in the political game since 2004. I never hear about the Koch brothers though, who have spent around 900 million on the 2016 elections alone. What about the bankers that are pulling everyones puppet strings? Nothing on that either? tool

And with tasty sauce .