Tb0n3

Yes. They should have put out the fires. It's almost as if the underground water system for the sprinklers failed. I can't imagine what kind of event would have damaged that. I mean, a building would have had to collapse in the area to do something like that. Unimaginable, isn't it?

ura_soul

it is quite clear that the building was deliberately setup to collapse from the inside, so perhaps that involved damaging the watering system first. there are those who have put forward the idea that there were secret tunnels under the buildings to facilitate a form of nuclear detonation that uses technology developed in the 1960s in america to turn rock into dust (originally intended for demolitions and terraforming the earth). this technology definitely exists and was even advertised by the us government in the 60s, so it is possible that that had a part to play.

Tb0n3

U wot mate

ura_soul

this is dimitri khalezov, who identifies as a specialist from the russian nuclear arsenal, who described what i am pointing at: https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/4481/dimitri-khalezov-wtc-nuclear-demolition-complete-full-length this is operation plowshare, the 1960s american project to use nuclear devices for non military purposes: https://www.ureka.org/videos/watch/8850/plowshare-program-american-atomic-bomb-tests-for-industrial-applications-wdtvlive42

Tb0n3

And you jump to some coverup of a well-known project? How does that make sense to you?

ura_soul

i'm not sure what you are asking here. operation plowshare is not particularly well known and i have not said it has been covered up.