doctorconimac

Pirate it

McBitches

Is it possible to see this film anywhere?

Spark_Plugg

I used to work at this shady restaurant that has close ties with big pharma (the people that ran the drug companies would hang out there nearly every day and throw drug parties where they would close the restaurant and all get fucked up on who knows what. One time they even brought strippers in and watched them fuck each other in the middle of the dining room), theyre like the mafia, they dont play around and they dont give a shit about you. I used to sell weed on the side, and one of the big guys threatened to take me out into the woods and "Have a discussion that I would NOT like to have" if he caught me again. We got raided multiple times while I worked there. But the head guys always knew when not to show up.

McBitches

It sounds like a movie. This whole vibe, thread included, is like Jimmy Conway from Goodfellas getting strong armed by bigger and badder spooks.

Spark_Plugg

I would watch that movie

ovix

So what's the motive behind poisoning an entire population?

k_digi

basically to keep you stupid and circle jerking - (which has been happening for 100's of 'years') because humans are generally considered too aggressive and dangerous to not be made docile (at least that seems to have been the opinion)

you planned to nuke the moon and tried to nuke yourselves multiple times, say it isn't so?

bm2112

Perhaps it was unintentional

psioniq

If I had to guess.. the same as always - money and power.

Can't make money off of a completely healthy population. It oddly makes sense to keep people sick, if you are in the business of curing people.

trollification

People need to wake up to how insidious Pharmaceutical companies are. Shame on anyone who continues to work for them (I did once and I left as soon as I discovered the truth about them).

necron30

What truth do you speak of?

So far it's my estimation that the top 5% of management are sociopaths, typical of most corporations. They make a good many decisions I'd categorize as profiteering, but under some extenuating circumstances. Regulatory burdens are consistently high and unpredictably catastrophic over a given 20 year period. Profiteering is required to keep cash reserved for fines and lawsuits.

Below that echelon are a bunch of normals who want to use their knowledge to help people and make a living doing so.

Is this fair? What do you think?

trollification

In my experience - all of senior management were sociopaths (if not actual felons)...

Driving motive was price per share - the company as a whole could actually care less about the patients being treated

Main driver for R&D was to make things "manageable" as opposed to finding cures. I have no proof, but I am convinced there were plenty of actual cures sitting on the shelves of the research labs - the problem was they could not find a way to make the condition "manageable". Manageable = scripts = profit. Cures = one time sale = no ROI.

The culture bred internally was one of cut-throat pirates who would knife each other in the back and sell their grandmothers into prostitution to get a promotion. This went from the maintenance guys up to the Division heads. It was everywhere and done on purpose by upper management - they wanted only the most heartless immoral characters to excel and rewarded deviant behavior. The more devious you were, the higher you rose.

Wastefulness was off the chart at the expense of sick people paying incredible prices for the drugs. Corporate jets for exec. wives to shop in Paris, catered lunches for every meeting (no matter how small or what department), town cars used in lieu of taxis or trains. Personal carpentry, decorating and IT Support for Execs homes., luxury cars given as bonuses to top sales people. Regular Sales Junkets to the Caribbean (where even mediocre sale people were allowed to spend lavishly), lavish fees paid to models and sports celebrities for product endorsements...

I felt dirty when I came home every day. Would NEVER work in pharma again - would rather sweep the streets and sleep with a clear head.

necron30

I can't speak to most of that, and I don't have any special knowledge so I'll grant that you are probably right about most of that, at least in the case of your previous employer.

I'm interested in continuing one line of thought though: cures sitting on the shelves. I don't know that that is true or false. What bothers me about that is that our attitude towards drugs is so backwards. We could develop some of the same drugs we do now and some entirely new ones and legalize them for enhancement of cognitive function and mental health. Instead we pathologize normal spectrum humans and require prescriptions and tests in what amounts to a systemic attempt to even the playing field by limiting the benefits to only those who need them daily. Sales of anti anxiety and stimulants and nootropics and psychedelics for enhancement would be huge and vastly profitable. They could find development of one time use cures like antibiotics which are desperately needed. Why is our attitude so insane about this?

trollification

Working in Pharma was a HUGE eye opener to me as to how sociopathic multi-national corporations can be allowed to become. The thing I probably felt to be most disturbing however, were the multitude of sheep-like employees who were perfectly content in their denial - and still are.

They had good salaries, bonuses and health insurance, so the fact that they were working on a drug product (say like a certain anti-depressant that produced brain ZAPs or suicidal tendencies documented as side effects) did not phase them at all. Patients or doctors who expressed concern were just "haters" (no, really, this is the juvenile level at which pharma people function - as if what they produce is a reality TV show) and any documented side effects were just "the cost of delivering a treatment that "customers" demanded and worked perfectly fine for a lot of patients". It was like working with a bunch of Stepford wives. All of them swooned over the CEO and President of US Pharma as if these people were rock stars - it was incredibly creepy and VERY cult like. I don't think I ever worked in a place where more people had exotic luxury cars as PC wallpaper. So glad I got out when I did.

As far as cures - like I said, I have no concrete proof of my assertions other than what my R&D friends would tell me off the record - but for example - one friend swore to me that they already had a permanent cure for male pattern baldness sitting on the shelves - FOR YEARS - the problem was that they could not synthesize this agent into a regular treatment (which would have been exponentially more lucrative). So basically they just sat on this compound until they could figure out how to turn it into a regular treatment. One could argue that a male pattern baldness cure is not the same as a cure for cancer, but there were also rumors that a permanent treatment for type 2 diabetes was shelved as well and it begs to ask how many other cures they have sitting around for debilitating illnesses...

axolotl__peyotl

This is explosive. This is about a film no one can see, because it exposes lunatics and destroyers in the vaccine industry.

Here is a quote from the Vaxxed producer and director, after their film was just axed from Robert De Niro’s Tribeca Festival (as reported by Jeremy Gerard, see : “‘Vaxxed’ Filmmakers Accuse De Niro, Tribeca Film Fest Of ‘Censorship’ In Wake Of Cancelation,” 3/26/2016):

“’To our dismay, we learned today about the Tribeca Film Festival’s decision to reverse the official selection of Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe,’ said Andrew Wakefield and Del Bigtree (the director and producer, respectively). Robert De Niro’s original defense of the film happened Friday after a one-hour conversation between De Niro and Bill Posey , the congressman who has interacted directly and at length with the CDC Whistleblower (William Thompson) and whose team has scrutinized the documents that prove fraud at the CDC. …” (emphasis added)

Okay. So here is the sequence…

  1. De Niro, who has an autistic child, decides to screen Vaxxed at his Tribeca Festival. It’s a film that reveals lies and crimes, and shows there is a causative connection between vaccines and autism.

  2. Pressure is applied to De Niro, so he meets with Florida Congressman Bill Posey, who lets him know the film is right on target. Posey knows, because he and his team have many pages of documents from CDC researcher, William Thompson, who blew the whistle on vaccine-autism fraud in 2014.

  3. De Niro decides he’ll not only screen the film, he’ll introduce it himself, live, onstage.

  4. out of the shadows emerge people who put the screws to De Niro. What do they tell him? His career in film will end? His annual Tribeca Film Festival will go down the toilet? The medical treatment his autistic child is receiving will be cut off? He and family are now “not safe?”

  5. De Niro backs away and cancels the showing of Vaxxed.

He’s been taught a lesson. Don’t go up against the medical cartel. Keep your mouth shut. Suffer in silence.

Think about this. You can see a film about US drone strikes killing innocent civilians. You can see a film about criminal surveillance of the entire population. You can see a film about the CIA overthrowing foreign governments. You can see a film about mega-corporations spewing chemicals into towns, where children are born with defects and adults are dying of cancer.

But you can’t see a film that suggests a vaccine could be causing autism.

That’s too hot. That strikes at a secret too big to tell.

That torpedoes a monopoly that must be protected, no matter what. Censored. Blacked out.

To boil down the background: In 2014, long-time respected CDC researcher, William Thompson, made a statement asserting that he and several esteemed colleagues had lied about a key study they authored 10 years earlier.

The study actually revealed a connection between the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine and the onset of autism in young black boys—but that part of the study was censored.

In fact, Thompson said, he and his colleagues sat in a room at the CDC, brought in a garbage can, and threw out those pages of research. That’s right.

But Thompson kept copies of the pages. Congressman Bill Posey and a few other people have those pages.

Thompson says, through his lawyer, that he will not speak to reporters. He’ll work with Congress, if an investigation is mounted. But there is no indication Congressional hearings will ever be laid on.

Because this story is too big.

This is the subject of the film, Vaxxed. The betrayal of the people by the Centers for Disease Control.

You can bet your bottom dollar that the prospect of Vaxxed being shown at Robert De Niro’s own festival—with him on stage introducing it—raised alarms at the CDC. Loud ones.

There is a very good chance that the CDC reached out to someone, who in turn reached out to De Niro and whispered in his ear and caused the actor to pause for thought.

He paused, and decided to turn around. He decided the risk was too great. He laid down his sword, such as it was, and went dark.

First Amendment? Never heard of it.

We now live in a country where the government decides, when it needs to, how to “protect the population” from “dangerous information.”

In this case, the Hippocratic Oath is turned inside out. It becomes: “First, do harm.”

Vaccines can cause autism? Well, sure, but don’t tell people that. Lie and keep lying, and keep calling it science.

Who cares how many children are destroyed? Protect the medical monopoly. Protect the vaccinators.

Don’t let a film see the light of day.

But it will. One way or another, it will be shown and people will see it and then they will know.