Wingedfoot13

I get that pressuring a patient to die is pretty terrible, but I don't see what is wrong with optimizing the chances of saving another person's life.

Unreasonable

Profiting off of human organ trading is bad sir. It is universally bad. Plus it's only optimizing the chances for those rich enough to afford brand new organs. Also corruption. Bring profit in and suddenly a lot more patients get 'terminal illnesses'.

Wingedfoot13

I was referring to the point of doing the operation while the patient, who had already decided to be euthanized, transferred organs while still alive until the hear was removed. If the patient agreed under completely non-bribed, non-pressured way what is so bad about optimizing the chance of saving a person? I think the article made some good points but threw some in to buffer the article.